How Does Substantive Environmental Compliance of Polluting Firms Form?—A Case Study on Private Enterprise Environmental Governance in China

Existing studies often reduce private firms’ environmental behaviors to mere greenwashing, rarely unpacking the underlying mechanisms that drive polluting enterprises to develop and sustain substantive compliance. This paper constructs a “Relational Self-Governing” analytical framework grounded in Self-Governance Theory’s core premise of stakeholder interdependence, identifying local social relationality as a critical mechanism that addresses the theory’s inherent limitations of narrow actor scope and interest-bound action logic. This mechanism drives polluting firms to maintain stable, substantive environmental compliance that exceeds minimum legal requirements. This finding expands Self-Governance Theory’s interest-centered practical strategy spectrum and enriches the analytical connotation of corporate agency embedded in localized environmental governance practices. Hierarchical environmental supervision pressures push firms to align operational targets with governmental environmental objectives, while embedded local social relations reinforce compliance incentives to sustain long-term substantive environmental practices. Three core relational paths underpin this process: goal alignment with local governments, peer recognition among firm owners, and shared environmental responsibility with local residents. Leveraging these paths, firms build stable interactive systems spanning government information sharing, inter-firm mutual supervision, and resident collaborative action, collectively constructing organizational legitimacy. This process gradually institutionalizes substantive environmental compliance and fosters public interest-aligned compliance behaviors. This study counters the one-sided greenwashing narrative in prior literature, extending Self-Governance Theory’s application by unpacking the unique operational logic of corporate substantive compliance in environmental governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18168562
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Substantive Environmental Compliance of Polluting Firms Form?—A Case Study on Private Enterprise Environmental Governance in China

Xiaoxiao Lin, Wei Jing
Sustainability
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

How Does Substantive Environmental Compliance of Polluting Firms Form?—A Case Study on Private Enterprise Environmental Governance in China

Xiaoxiao Lin, Wei Jing
article en

Abstract

Existing studies often reduce private firms’ environmental behaviors to mere greenwashing, rarely unpacking the underlying mechanisms that drive polluting enterprises to develop and sustain substantive compliance. This paper constructs a “Relational Self-Governing” analytical framework grounded in Self-Governance Theory’s core premise of stakeholder interdependence, identifying local social relationality as a critical mechanism that addresses the theory’s inherent limitations of narrow actor scope and interest-bound action logic. This mechanism drives polluting firms to maintain stable, substantive environmental compliance that exceeds minimum legal requirements. This finding expands Self-Governance Theory’s interest-centered practical strategy spectrum and enriches the analytical connotation of corporate agency embedded in localized environmental governance practices. Hierarchical environmental supervision pressures push firms to align operational targets with governmental environmental objectives, while embedded local social relations reinforce compliance incentives to sustain long-term substantive environmental practices. Three core relational paths underpin this process: goal alignment with local governments, peer recognition among firm owners, and shared environmental responsibility with local residents. Leveraging these paths, firms build stable interactive systems spanning government information sharing, inter-firm mutual supervision, and resident collaborative action, collectively constructing organizational legitimacy. This process gradually institutionalizes substantive environmental compliance and fosters public interest-aligned compliance behaviors. This study counters the one-sided greenwashing narrative in prior literature, extending Self-Governance Theory’s application by unpacking the unique operational logic of corporate substantive compliance in environmental governance.

SustainabilityVol. 18(16)
Hohai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Does Substantive Environmental Compliance of Polluting Firms Form?—A Case Study on Private Enterprise Environmental Governance in China — Xiaoxiao Lin, Wei Jing · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS