Diversity of circular economies from Global South evidence

Abstract The circular economy (CE) is widely viewed as a key global lever for sustainable resource use. However, CE conceptualizations have focused mostly on high resource use in the Global North, largely neglecting the drivers, solutions and enablers of circularity in the socio-economic contexts of the Global South. Here, based on a systematic review of 183 peer-reviewed articles, we assess how CE manifests in the Global South. We find circular solutions to be considerably more bottom-up, centring around community-level and often informal practices rather than the top-down, policy and industrially driven activities that dominate the Global North-informed CE literature. CE motivations similarly differ, being primarily rooted in socio-economic needs and cultural practices rather than environmental concerns. Finally, CE enablers are often based on socially and technically adaptive approaches rather than technological innovation. These differences reveal that inclusive circular pathways for sustainable development depend strongly on context, suggesting the need for more flexible and empirically grounded CE concepts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Sustainability
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-026-01901-z
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity of circular economies from Global South evidence

Elsie Onsongo, Philipp A. Trotter, Lucas Straub, Detlef Peter van Vuuren et al.
Nature Sustainability
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Diversity of circular economies from Global South evidence

Elsie Onsongo, Philipp A. Trotter, Lucas Straub, Detlef Peter van Vuuren, Julian Kirchherr
article en

Abstract

Abstract The circular economy (CE) is widely viewed as a key global lever for sustainable resource use. However, CE conceptualizations have focused mostly on high resource use in the Global North, largely neglecting the drivers, solutions and enablers of circularity in the socio-economic contexts of the Global South. Here, based on a systematic review of 183 peer-reviewed articles, we assess how CE manifests in the Global South. We find circular solutions to be considerably more bottom-up, centring around community-level and often informal practices rather than the top-down, policy and industrially driven activities that dominate the Global North-informed CE literature. CE motivations similarly differ, being primarily rooted in socio-economic needs and cultural practices rather than environmental concerns. Finally, CE enablers are often based on socially and technically adaptive approaches rather than technological innovation. These differences reveal that inclusive circular pathways for sustainable development depend strongly on context, suggesting the need for more flexible and empirically grounded CE concepts.

Nature Sustainability
Roskilde University (DK), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), University of Wuppertal (DE), Utrecht University (NL), University of Oxford (GB), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KE), Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Friedrich Naumann Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diversity of circular economies from Global South evidence — Elsie Onsongo, Philipp A. Trotter, et al. · Nature Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS