Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and the learning curve of an insourced, clinician-performed three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction workflow using Synapse3D™ software in a robotic urologic surgery setting. Methods: In this prospective single-centre case series, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for robotic kidney surgery were enrolled over a 30-day period. Three urology residents without prior experience in 3D reconstruction completed a structured two-day training programme including eight supervised practice reconstructions. Subsequently, each one reconstructed all 20 study cases independently. Reconstruction time was recorded for every reconstruction. After surgery, the two operating surgeons independently rated each model on a 5-point Likert scale for anatomical fidelity, defined as the correspondence between the model and the anatomy encountered intraoperatively. Results: All 60 reconstructions were completed successfully, with no failed reconstructions, no DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) import errors and no software crashes; assistance from the manufacturer was never required. Mean reconstruction time was 19 min (range 11–29 min). Reconstruction time decreased by 0.63 min per case (95% CI 0.51–0.74; p < 0.001). Median time fell from 23 min in the first ten cases to 15 min in the last ten (p < 0.001), and the reduction was significant for each operator analysed separately. Anatomical fidelity was rated 4 (IQR 1) by both surgeons. The two surgeons rated overall system usability 3/5 and 5/5. Conclusions: Insourced 3D reconstruction with Synapse3D™ is technically feasible and is learned rapidly and reproducibly by urology residents after limited training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162692
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software

Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Enrico Panio, Carlo Gandi, Nazario Foschi et al.
Cancers
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software

Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Enrico Panio, Carlo Gandi, Nazario Foschi, Matteo Pavone, Filippo Turri, Bernardo Rocco, Emilio Sacco, Simone Assumma, Angelo Totaro, Filippo Gavi, Pierluigi Russo, Giuseppe Pallotta, Martina Bracco, Daniele Fettucciari, Alessandra Francocci, V. Cavarra, Francesco Rossi, Marco Montesi, Lorenzo D’Amico, Cristina Carerj, Nicoletta Testori, Giorgia Gaia, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and the learning curve of an insourced, clinician-performed three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction workflow using Synapse3D™ software in a robotic urologic surgery setting. Methods: In this prospective single-centre case series, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for robotic kidney surgery were enrolled over a 30-day period. Three urology residents without prior experience in 3D reconstruction completed a structured two-day training programme including eight supervised practice reconstructions. Subsequently, each one reconstructed all 20 study cases independently. Reconstruction time was recorded for every reconstruction. After surgery, the two operating surgeons independently rated each model on a 5-point Likert scale for anatomical fidelity, defined as the correspondence between the model and the anatomy encountered intraoperatively. Results: All 60 reconstructions were completed successfully, with no failed reconstructions, no DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) import errors and no software crashes; assistance from the manufacturer was never required. Mean reconstruction time was 19 min (range 11–29 min). Reconstruction time decreased by 0.63 min per case (95% CI 0.51–0.74; p < 0.001). Median time fell from 23 min in the first ten cases to 15 min in the last ten (p < 0.001), and the reduction was significant for each operator analysed separately. Anatomical fidelity was rated 4 (IQR 1) by both surgeons. The two surgeons rated overall system usability 3/5 and 5/5. Conclusions: Insourced 3D reconstruction with Synapse3D™ is technically feasible and is learned rapidly and reproducibly by urology residents after limited training.

CancersVol. 18(16)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.