Development and Validation of the Brief Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales

Compassion for self or others involves recognizing suffering, understanding its universality, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating distress, and being motivated to help. Existing measures, such as the Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales for the Self (SOCS-S) and Others (SOCS-O), are comprehensive but lengthy. This study derived 5-item short forms of each scale (Brief SOCS-S and Brief SOCS-O) based on the original SOCS item loadings and theoretical representation of the five compassion components, preserving construct coverage while reducing burden. The scales were examined across students ( N = 268), the general population ( N = 43,999), and NHS staff ( N = 1,569). Both measures showed acceptable internal consistency, moderate-to-good test–retest reliability, adequate one-factor structure, and broad support for measurement invariance across gender and age groups in the general population. Some confirmatory factor analysis models showed slightly elevated root mean square error of approximation values, and the Universality item had weaker loadings and ceiling effects in both scales. However, total-score ceiling effects were absent in the Brief SOCS-S and minimal in the Brief SOCS-O. Overall, the Brief SOCS scales provide concise, theoretically grounded, and psychometrically adequate assessments of compassion when brevity and reduced respondent burden are priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261475801
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Brief Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales

Clara Strauss, Jenny Gu, Daniel Cullen, Kate Cavanagh et al.
Assessment
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Development and Validation of the Brief Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales

Clara Strauss, Jenny Gu, Daniel Cullen, Kate Cavanagh, Ryad Chems-Maarif, Ruth Baer, Robin Banerjee
article en

Abstract

Compassion for self or others involves recognizing suffering, understanding its universality, feeling for the person suffering, tolerating distress, and being motivated to help. Existing measures, such as the Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales for the Self (SOCS-S) and Others (SOCS-O), are comprehensive but lengthy. This study derived 5-item short forms of each scale (Brief SOCS-S and Brief SOCS-O) based on the original SOCS item loadings and theoretical representation of the five compassion components, preserving construct coverage while reducing burden. The scales were examined across students ( N = 268), the general population ( N = 43,999), and NHS staff ( N = 1,569). Both measures showed acceptable internal consistency, moderate-to-good test–retest reliability, adequate one-factor structure, and broad support for measurement invariance across gender and age groups in the general population. Some confirmatory factor analysis models showed slightly elevated root mean square error of approximation values, and the Universality item had weaker loadings and ceiling effects in both scales. However, total-score ceiling effects were absent in the Brief SOCS-S and minimal in the Brief SOCS-O. Overall, the Brief SOCS scales provide concise, theoretically grounded, and psychometrically adequate assessments of compassion when brevity and reduced respondent burden are priorities.

Assessment
University of Sussex (GB), Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and Validation of the Brief Sussex–Oxford Compassion Scales — Clara Strauss, Jenny Gu, et al. · Assessment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS