Pain Sensitivity, Pain Catastrophizing and Fear‐Avoidance in Adult Runners: Injured vs. Uninjured Comparisons and Multivariable Associations

PURPOSE: Personal beliefs about pain, such as pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance, are believed to influence central pain processing, but their relationship to pain sensitivity in injured runners remains unclear. This study examined whether injured runners exhibit greater pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs compared to uninjured runners, and explored the extent to which pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance predict pain sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 235 adult runners (18-76 years) who had been running consistently (1-3 times/week for ≥ 3 months) were included. Using scores from the update to the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire (OSTRC-O2), participants were categorized as uninjured (score = 0) or injured (score > 0). All participants completed the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Between-group differences were tested with independent-sample t-tests and adjusted linear regression models, while PSQ predictors were examined using stepwise multivariable regression adjusting for demographic and training covariates. RESULTS: = 0.41, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Injured runners reported higher pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance than uninjured runners. Although catastrophizing rumination and fear-avoidance beliefs were associated with greater pain sensitivity, these cross-sectional findings do not establish causation, and longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether targeting these factors influences running participation limitations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Injured runners reported meaningfully higher pain sensitivity alongside elevated pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs despite similar demographics and training exposure to uninjured runners, highlighting that injury-related pain experience is not explained by running load alone. Pain catastrophizing (rumination) and fear-avoidance independently predicted pain sensitivity, supporting a biopsychosocial model in which cognitive-affective factors uniquely shape the pain experience in runners. These findings identify potentially modifiable targets for clinical screening and rehabilitation (e.g., pain education and graded exposure) to better contextualize symptoms and guide training decisions in injured runners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pain
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70340
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain Sensitivity, Pain Catastrophizing and Fear‐Avoidance in Adult Runners: Injured vs. Uninjured Comparisons and Multivariable Associations

Jo Armour Smith, Natalia Sánchez, Andrew Hooyman, Susan Sigward et al.
European Journal of Pain
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Pain Sensitivity, Pain Catastrophizing and Fear‐Avoidance in Adult Runners: Injured vs. Uninjured Comparisons and Multivariable Associations

Jo Armour Smith, Natalia Sánchez, Andrew Hooyman, Susan Sigward, Shawn Farrokhi, Emma Beisheim‐Ryan, Paloma Pallante
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Personal beliefs about pain, such as pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance, are believed to influence central pain processing, but their relationship to pain sensitivity in injured runners remains unclear. This study examined whether injured runners exhibit greater pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs compared to uninjured runners, and explored the extent to which pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance predict pain sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 235 adult runners (18-76 years) who had been running consistently (1-3 times/week for ≥ 3 months) were included. Using scores from the update to the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire (OSTRC-O2), participants were categorized as uninjured (score = 0) or injured (score > 0). All participants completed the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Between-group differences were tested with independent-sample t-tests and adjusted linear regression models, while PSQ predictors were examined using stepwise multivariable regression adjusting for demographic and training covariates. RESULTS: = 0.41, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Injured runners reported higher pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance than uninjured runners. Although catastrophizing rumination and fear-avoidance beliefs were associated with greater pain sensitivity, these cross-sectional findings do not establish causation, and longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether targeting these factors influences running participation limitations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Injured runners reported meaningfully higher pain sensitivity alongside elevated pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs despite similar demographics and training exposure to uninjured runners, highlighting that injury-related pain experience is not explained by running load alone. Pain catastrophizing (rumination) and fear-avoidance independently predicted pain sensitivity, supporting a biopsychosocial model in which cognitive-affective factors uniquely shape the pain experience in runners. These findings identify potentially modifiable targets for clinical screening and rehabilitation (e.g., pain education and graded exposure) to better contextualize symptoms and guide training decisions in injured runners.

European Journal of PainVol. 30(8)
University of Southern California (US), Naval Medical Center San Diego (US), Chapman University (US), Defense Health Agency (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.