The Usefulness of Falls Efficacy Scale-International in Predicting Falls in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Background: The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is an assessment tool designed to measure the level of fear of falling in older adults. This scale was developed to evaluate how much an individual fears falling during various daily activities. The aim of the study was to assess the discriminatory power of FES-I to predict falls within 2 years. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between FES-I and vascular status. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, 130 patients (mean age, 64.7 ± 14.6 years) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were analyzed. Of these, 90 patients had nondialysis CKD: 15 had stage G3 (G3a, n = 5; G3b, n = 10), 38 had stage G4, and 37 had stage G5. The remaining 40 patients (30.7%) were prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The most frequent cause of CKD was hypertension and diabetes in 57 (43.8%) of patients. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) was used to assess fear of falling. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbidity, and the 10-year cardiovascular risk was assessed using a web-based calculator QRESEARCH Cardiovascular Risk Algorithm, version 3 (QRISK®3), and hemodynamic parameters were measured using a Mobil-O-Graph monitor. Participants were followed for 2 years to assess the occurrence of falls. Results: During the two-year follow-up, 49 of 130 participants (37.7%) experienced at least one fall. FES-I demonstrated good discrimination for falls (AUC 0.836; bootstrap 95% CI, 0.760–0.903). In multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, dialysis status, comorbidity, and functional status, FES-I remained independently associated with falls (adjusted OR per 1-point increase, 1.145; 95% CI, 1.060–1.237; p < 0.001). Addition of FES-I to the basic clinical model increased the AUC from 0.826 to 0.874, although the difference was of borderline statistical significance in paired receiver operating characteristics (ROC) comparison (p = 0.053). The data-derived Youden-optimal threshold was 25 points; however, bootstrap analysis indicated threshold variability, and this cut-off should be considered exploratory. Conclusions: Higher FES-I scores were independently associated with falls during two-year follow-up and may provide additional prognostic information beyond selected clinical risk factors. FES-I may represent a candidate screening instrument for fall-risk assessment in CKD; however, the proposed cut-off (25 points) requires prospective external validation.