Flowable Porcine Urinary Bladder Matrix in Wounds Complicated by Tunneling and Undermining: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Objective: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study evaluated the safety and preliminary clinical performance of a flowable porcine urinary bladder matrix (UBM) particulate for managing tunneling and undermining features in complex wounds. These features are associated with delayed healing, chronic inflammation, and infection risk. Flowable UBM enables targeted delivery into wound tunnels and cavities. Method: Twenty-five subjects from 3 United States (U.S.) sites were enrolled, with 21 meeting protocol criteria for analysis (15 with undermining and 6 with tunneling wounds). Participants received flowable UBM applied directly to tunneling or undermining areas, along with additional UBM particulate or sheet forms applied to the wound surface. The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in tunneling volume or undermining depth at 12 weeks, with secondary assessment of reduction in overall wound volume. Safety was evaluated through evaluation of device-related adverse events. Results: At 12 weeks, 90.5% of wounds demonstrated positive response, with mean ± standard deviation and median reduction in tunneling or undermining dimensions of 84.6 ± 29.3% and 100.0%, respectively. Complete resolution of these features occurred in 52.4% of wounds (53.3% in undermining and 50.0% in tunneling wounds) with higher closure rates in non-pressure wounds compared to pressure injuries. No device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Overall, flowable UBM was well tolerated and associated with favorable clinical trajectories demonstrated by reduction in tunneling and undermining dimensions; however, comparative effectiveness cannot be inferred from this limited single-arm pilot study. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm comparative effectiveness and optimize clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166432
Primary Topic
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flowable Porcine Urinary Bladder Matrix in Wounds Complicated by Tunneling and Undermining: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Yi Duan-Arnold, Alisha Oropallo, Kristy L. Hawley, Michael Cripps et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
article

Flowable Porcine Urinary Bladder Matrix in Wounds Complicated by Tunneling and Undermining: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Yi Duan-Arnold, Alisha Oropallo, Kristy L. Hawley, Michael Cripps, Hannah Baker, Jeffrey W. Shupp, Yifei Dai, Jessica L. Evans, Weiwei Xu, Saarah Mohammedi, Malachy E. Asuku, Claire Witherel, Marcie Jaffee
article en

Abstract

Objective: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study evaluated the safety and preliminary clinical performance of a flowable porcine urinary bladder matrix (UBM) particulate for managing tunneling and undermining features in complex wounds. These features are associated with delayed healing, chronic inflammation, and infection risk. Flowable UBM enables targeted delivery into wound tunnels and cavities. Method: Twenty-five subjects from 3 United States (U.S.) sites were enrolled, with 21 meeting protocol criteria for analysis (15 with undermining and 6 with tunneling wounds). Participants received flowable UBM applied directly to tunneling or undermining areas, along with additional UBM particulate or sheet forms applied to the wound surface. The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in tunneling volume or undermining depth at 12 weeks, with secondary assessment of reduction in overall wound volume. Safety was evaluated through evaluation of device-related adverse events. Results: At 12 weeks, 90.5% of wounds demonstrated positive response, with mean ± standard deviation and median reduction in tunneling or undermining dimensions of 84.6 ± 29.3% and 100.0%, respectively. Complete resolution of these features occurred in 52.4% of wounds (53.3% in undermining and 50.0% in tunneling wounds) with higher closure rates in non-pressure wounds compared to pressure injuries. No device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Overall, flowable UBM was well tolerated and associated with favorable clinical trajectories demonstrated by reduction in tunneling and undermining dimensions; however, comparative effectiveness cannot be inferred from this limited single-arm pilot study. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm comparative effectiveness and optimize clinical use.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(16)
Northwell Health (US), Integra LifeSciences (United States) (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), MedStar Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.