Attention U-Net-Based Segmentation and Hybrid Classification for Detection of Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells

Background/Objectives: Circulating tumor-associated cells (CTACs) are rare among peripheral blood nucleated cells (PBNCs), creating a challenge for image-based multi-cancer detection. We evaluated a predefined CTAC-detection pipeline incorporating Attention U-Net segmentation, post-processing, cytological feature extraction, and Random Forest classification. Methods: Model suitability was explored in asymptomatic individuals and patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical performance was assessed in a case–control cohort of therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, benign conditions, and asymptomatic individuals, followed by four prospective cohort evaluations performed within the same laboratory and imaging workflow: recurrent cancer with low radiological tumor burden, peri-operative solid tumors, suspected cancer, and asymptomatic screening. PBNCs were stained with EpCAM/Hoechst 33342 and imaged. Pathologists’ review established ground truth annotations. Results: The model had 90.68% sensitivity and 99.53% specificity in the exploratory study. In the case–control cohort, sensitivity was 88.65% in therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, while specificity was 78.95% in benign conditions and >99.9% in asymptomatic individuals. In the prospective cohorts, CTAC detection sensitivity was 91.96% in pretreated low tumor burden cases; CTACs were detected in 100% of pre-surgery specimens and 29.41% of post-surgery specimens; and in suspected cancer cases, the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 96.34% and 32.35%, respectively. In the asymptomatic screening cohort, 44/7183 participants were CTAC-positive; 16 had confirmed Stage I/II cancer, 10 had no radiologically detectable disease at the available assessment, and 18 remained unresolved. The conservative lower-bound PPV was 36.36%, and the NPV was 99.97%; estimates remain provisional pending complete follow-up. Conclusions: The integrated Attention U-Net/feature-based classification pipeline demonstrated consistent CTAC detection across the evaluated cohorts and supports its potential clinical utility for cancer detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162691
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attention U-Net-Based Segmentation and Hybrid Classification for Detection of Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells

Stefan Schuster, Humaid O. Al‐Shamsi, Rajan Datar, Nitesh Rohatgi et al.
Cancers
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

Attention U-Net-Based Segmentation and Hybrid Classification for Detection of Circulating Tumor-Associated Cells

Stefan Schuster, Humaid O. Al‐Shamsi, Rajan Datar, Nitesh Rohatgi, Pradyumna Shejwalkar, Massimo Cristofanilli, Dadasaheb Akolkar, T Crook, Ajay Srinivasan, Prashant Kumar, Snehal Golar, Aditya Shreenivas, Darshana Patil, Vineet Datta, Shoeb Patel, Andrew Gaya, Raymond Page, Sewanti Limaye
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Circulating tumor-associated cells (CTACs) are rare among peripheral blood nucleated cells (PBNCs), creating a challenge for image-based multi-cancer detection. We evaluated a predefined CTAC-detection pipeline incorporating Attention U-Net segmentation, post-processing, cytological feature extraction, and Random Forest classification. Methods: Model suitability was explored in asymptomatic individuals and patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical performance was assessed in a case–control cohort of therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, benign conditions, and asymptomatic individuals, followed by four prospective cohort evaluations performed within the same laboratory and imaging workflow: recurrent cancer with low radiological tumor burden, peri-operative solid tumors, suspected cancer, and asymptomatic screening. PBNCs were stained with EpCAM/Hoechst 33342 and imaged. Pathologists’ review established ground truth annotations. Results: The model had 90.68% sensitivity and 99.53% specificity in the exploratory study. In the case–control cohort, sensitivity was 88.65% in therapy-naive stage I/II cancers, while specificity was 78.95% in benign conditions and >99.9% in asymptomatic individuals. In the prospective cohorts, CTAC detection sensitivity was 91.96% in pretreated low tumor burden cases; CTACs were detected in 100% of pre-surgery specimens and 29.41% of post-surgery specimens; and in suspected cancer cases, the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 96.34% and 32.35%, respectively. In the asymptomatic screening cohort, 44/7183 participants were CTAC-positive; 16 had confirmed Stage I/II cancer, 10 had no radiologically detectable disease at the available assessment, and 18 remained unresolved. The conservative lower-bound PPV was 36.36%, and the NPV was 99.97%; estimates remain provisional pending complete follow-up. Conclusions: The integrated Attention U-Net/feature-based classification pipeline demonstrated consistent CTAC detection across the evaluated cohorts and supports its potential clinical utility for cancer detection.

CancersVol. 18(16)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Cornell University (US), Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Fortis Memorial Research Institute (IN), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Datar Cancer Genetics (India) (IN), Bupa Cromwell Hospital (GB), Cancer Genetics (United States) (US), Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.