Breaking the free-access trap: Adaptive groundwater governance in Pakistan

Groundwater governance in Pakistan represents a persistent case of governance inertia, where a de facto free-access regime continues despite growing recognition of depletion and sustainability risks. Although policy frameworks increasingly acknowledge over-extraction, regulatory reforms have remained weakly implemented and politically constrained. This study examines why groundwater governance reforms remain difficult to initiate and what conditions may enable transitions toward more adaptive and regulated governance. Drawing on insights from Common-Pool Resource (CPR) theory, adaptive governance and the Science–Policy–Practice Interface (SPPI), the study analyses national and provincial policy frameworks alongside evidence from six participatory multi-stakeholder workshops involving farmers, scientists and policymakers in Punjab and Sindh. The findings show that governance inertia is not simply a consequence of weak institutions or inadequate data, but a politically and institutionally stabilised condition reproduced through fragmented mandates, ambiguous groundwater rights linked to landownership, political incentives and misalignments in credibility, salience and legitimacy across stakeholder groups. By operationalising SPPI in a groundwater governance context, the study demonstrates how divergent stakeholder interpretations constrain collective action and limit the feasibility of reform even where sustainability risks are widely recognised. The findings further show that transitions toward sustainable groundwater governance are shaped not only by regulatory design, but also by institutional readiness, stakeholder legitimacy and the sequencing of reforms under politically constrained conditions. The study contributes to groundwater governance scholarship by explaining how interacting institutional, political and legitimacy dynamics stabilise unsustainable groundwater systems and constrain governance transitions in politically constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103486
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking the free-access trap: Adaptive groundwater governance in Pakistan

Faizan ul Hasan, Lain Dare, Darren Sinclair
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Breaking the free-access trap: Adaptive groundwater governance in Pakistan

Faizan ul Hasan, Lain Dare, Darren Sinclair
article en

Abstract

Groundwater governance in Pakistan represents a persistent case of governance inertia, where a de facto free-access regime continues despite growing recognition of depletion and sustainability risks. Although policy frameworks increasingly acknowledge over-extraction, regulatory reforms have remained weakly implemented and politically constrained. This study examines why groundwater governance reforms remain difficult to initiate and what conditions may enable transitions toward more adaptive and regulated governance. Drawing on insights from Common-Pool Resource (CPR) theory, adaptive governance and the Science–Policy–Practice Interface (SPPI), the study analyses national and provincial policy frameworks alongside evidence from six participatory multi-stakeholder workshops involving farmers, scientists and policymakers in Punjab and Sindh. The findings show that governance inertia is not simply a consequence of weak institutions or inadequate data, but a politically and institutionally stabilised condition reproduced through fragmented mandates, ambiguous groundwater rights linked to landownership, political incentives and misalignments in credibility, salience and legitimacy across stakeholder groups. By operationalising SPPI in a groundwater governance context, the study demonstrates how divergent stakeholder interpretations constrain collective action and limit the feasibility of reform even where sustainability risks are widely recognised. The findings further show that transitions toward sustainable groundwater governance are shaped not only by regulatory design, but also by institutional readiness, stakeholder legitimacy and the sequencing of reforms under politically constrained conditions. The study contributes to groundwater governance scholarship by explaining how interacting institutional, political and legitimacy dynamics stabilise unsustainable groundwater systems and constrain governance transitions in politically constrained settings.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
University of Canberra (AU)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.