China’s solar expansion policy reduces bird diversity
Could the global transition to renewable energy create a green dilemma that pits carbon reduction against biodiversity conservation? This study examined the effect of policies promoting solar photovoltaics on local avian biodiversity using a panel dataset covering 2344 counties in China from 2014 to 2023. Policies that favored photovoltaic expansion led to reductions in bird diversity, disproportionately affecting wealthier and nondesert regions, as well as widespread species. The mechanism operated primarily through land conversion: Cropland and grassland were transformed into developed areas, reducing the diversity of vegetation. Paradoxically, the leaf area index increased, a pattern we term "inferior greening," whereby diverse natural landscapes were replaced by dense but ecologically homogeneous vegetation. We argue that future photovoltaic development should be accompanied by strict biodiversity safeguards, especially in economically developed regions with high habitat complexity.
Authors
- Thi Thuc Anh Phan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-2687)
- Shanjun Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6141-8940)
- Yinyin Cai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-4510)
- Kai Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-8322)
- Shouyang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-998X)
- Aixin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6904-4285)
- Huiming Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-3593)
- Yueming Qiu
- Shoujun Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-1289)
Institutions
- Central University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- VinUniversity (VN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science
- Published
- 2026-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aee0747
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.32
Funders
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences