Elicited Choice Probability to Account for Uncertain Responses to Hypothetical Travel Survey Questions

In contrast to the typical discrete choice survey response format, this paper examines Elicited Choice Probability (ECP) data, in which respondents explicitly report uncertain behaviour in hypothetical scenarios. Using survey data from e-bike incentive programs in British Columbia, Canada, we find that most respondents reported more than one possible choice, although they had a strong leading alternative with nearly 80% average likelihood. The ECP data add nuance, but yield similar aggregate choice probabilities (<5%pt difference). A single-choice response format may be preferred to reduce response burden, but analysts should consider the bias it creates toward more-certain alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Findings
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.165425
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elicited Choice Probability to Account for Uncertain Responses to Hypothetical Travel Survey Questions

Amir Hassanpour, Alexander York Bigazzi
Findings
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Elicited Choice Probability to Account for Uncertain Responses to Hypothetical Travel Survey Questions

Amir Hassanpour, Alexander York Bigazzi
article en

Abstract

In contrast to the typical discrete choice survey response format, this paper examines Elicited Choice Probability (ECP) data, in which respondents explicitly report uncertain behaviour in hypothetical scenarios. Using survey data from e-bike incentive programs in British Columbia, Canada, we find that most respondents reported more than one possible choice, although they had a strong leading alternative with nearly 80% average likelihood. The ECP data add nuance, but yield similar aggregate choice probabilities (<5%pt difference). A single-choice response format may be preferred to reduce response burden, but analysts should consider the bias it creates toward more-certain alternatives.

Findings
University of British Columbia (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elicited Choice Probability to Account for Uncertain Responses to Hypothetical Travel Survey Questions — Amir Hassanpour, Alexander York Bigazzi · Findings (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS