Carbon Effects of Land Consolidation: Knowledge Evolution, Analytical Paradigms, and a Future Research Agenda

Land consolidation (LC) is increasingly expected to support food security, ecological restoration, rural development, and climate mitigation, yet evidence on its carbon effects remains fragmented across engineering, ecological, spatial, and governance research. This review combines bibliometric mapping with structured evidence synthesis of 355 records from WoS and CNKI to examine knowledge evolution, analytical paradigms, and their integration. The field has expanded from component-based assessments of construction emissions, soil carbon, and land-cover change toward life-cycle accounting, carbon fractions, ecosystem-service interactions, spatial optimization, and policy evaluation. WoS-indexed and Chinese-language literature show distinct but increasingly convergent orientations shaped by differences in intervention contexts, disciplinary traditions, analytical scales, and available evidence. Four complementary paradigms are identified: carbon accounting, biogeochemical processes, spatial land systems, and decision support and governance. Together, these paradigms reveal interconnected carbon pathways but remain constrained by inconsistent accounting boundaries, weak process–scale–time linkages, and limited integration with land-governance decisions. Future research should therefore advance standardized life-cycle and multi-scale accounting, mechanism-based assessment of long-term carbon and ecosystem-service dynamics, and digitally and institutionally enabled low-carbon governance.