Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe

Human-wildlife interactions present both challenges and opportunities across Europe. Managing these interactions often requires decisions that fall between reactive (taking action after a problem arises) and proactive (anticipating and preventing negative impacts) management. This study examines factors influencing public attitudes toward proactive and reactive wildlife management in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom), based on an online survey of 2400 participants. We relied on the cognitive hierarchy framework to explain relationships between management attitudes and factors such as wildlife value orientations, risk perceptions, and perceptions of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Attitudes toward wildlife management were generally shaped by value orientations and risk perception. Mutualism was associated with support for proactive wildlife and human protection, whereas domination was associated with reactive and proactive management aimed at protecting human interests. Higher perceived risk further increased support for proactive management strategies. These results provide practical insights into how public attitudes relate to wildlife management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe

Camilla Sandström, Fredrik Widemo, Miguel Delibes‐Mateos, Jenny Anne Glikman et al.
AMBIO
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe

Camilla Sandström, Fredrik Widemo, Miguel Delibes‐Mateos, Jenny Anne Glikman, Rafael Villafuerte‐Jordán, María Martínez‐Jauregui
article en

Abstract

Human-wildlife interactions present both challenges and opportunities across Europe. Managing these interactions often requires decisions that fall between reactive (taking action after a problem arises) and proactive (anticipating and preventing negative impacts) management. This study examines factors influencing public attitudes toward proactive and reactive wildlife management in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom), based on an online survey of 2400 participants. We relied on the cognitive hierarchy framework to explain relationships between management attitudes and factors such as wildlife value orientations, risk perceptions, and perceptions of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Attitudes toward wildlife management were generally shaped by value orientations and risk perception. Mutualism was associated with support for proactive wildlife and human protection, whereas domination was associated with reactive and proactive management aimed at protecting human interests. Higher perceived risk further increased support for proactive management strategies. These results provide practical insights into how public attitudes relate to wildlife management.

AMBIO
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (ES), Umeå University (SE)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.