Evaluation Framework for Sustaining Youth Project-Based Learning Experiences

Background Sustaining experiential education programs requires evaluation approaches that clarify how implementation aligns with program goals and guiding frameworks. Formative evaluation offers a way to examine practitioner facilitation across sites. Purpose This study used a formative evaluation framework to examine how practitioners implemented Project-Based Learning (PBL) within the Scientific Outdoor Experiences (SOE) program and how practices aligned with the program's goals and equity-centered leadership principles. Method Semistructured interviews were conducted with four practitioners across two SOE sites. Analysis was guided by three structures: the SOE Logic Model, the Gold Standard PBL Essential Project Design Elements, and the Principles for Educational Leadership for Intentional Equity. A hybrid deductive–inductive coding approach identified patterns and themes. Findings Five themes emerged: encouraging youth empowerment through leadership and relationships; community as the foundation for curriculum and engagement; critical inquiry and systems thinking; feedback and collaboration; and barriers and challenges. These themes illustrate how the framework captures alignment and variation in practitioner responses across contexts. Implications Findings show how formative evaluation can support practitioner reflection, inform professional development, and strengthen program sustainability in experiential education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experiential Education
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259261476018
Primary Topic
Outdoor and Experiential Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Framework for Sustaining Youth Project-Based Learning Experiences

R. Justin Hougham, Brad Bessler, Nabina Giri, Lily Gruenewald
Journal of Experiential Education
Outdoor and Experiential Education
article

Evaluation Framework for Sustaining Youth Project-Based Learning Experiences

R. Justin Hougham, Brad Bessler, Nabina Giri, Lily Gruenewald
article en

Abstract

Background Sustaining experiential education programs requires evaluation approaches that clarify how implementation aligns with program goals and guiding frameworks. Formative evaluation offers a way to examine practitioner facilitation across sites. Purpose This study used a formative evaluation framework to examine how practitioners implemented Project-Based Learning (PBL) within the Scientific Outdoor Experiences (SOE) program and how practices aligned with the program's goals and equity-centered leadership principles. Method Semistructured interviews were conducted with four practitioners across two SOE sites. Analysis was guided by three structures: the SOE Logic Model, the Gold Standard PBL Essential Project Design Elements, and the Principles for Educational Leadership for Intentional Equity. A hybrid deductive–inductive coding approach identified patterns and themes. Findings Five themes emerged: encouraging youth empowerment through leadership and relationships; community as the foundation for curriculum and engagement; critical inquiry and systems thinking; feedback and collaboration; and barriers and challenges. These themes illustrate how the framework captures alignment and variation in practitioner responses across contexts. Implications Findings show how formative evaluation can support practitioner reflection, inform professional development, and strengthen program sustainability in experiential education contexts.

Journal of Experiential Education
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Outdoor and Experiential Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.