Anti‐Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibodies Distinguish Ulcerative Colitis From Crohn's Disease With High Diagnostic Accuracy and Outperform ANCA and ASCA Status: A Prospective Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT Background Reliable biomarkers to distinguish ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) remain limited. Aims To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies for differentiating UC from CD and to compare their performance with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and anti‐ Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA). Methods In this prospective cross‐sectional study in patients with UC and CD, serum anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies, ASCA, and ANCA were measured and clinical data were collected. The primary outcome was the accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 antibodies in distinguishing UC from CD. Secondary analyses compared their performance with ASCA and ANCA status and across IBD subgroups. Results A total of 224 patients were included (UC: n = 106, CD: n = 118, male: 63.8%, median age: 43.5 years). Patients with indeterminate colitis were excluded. At a cut‐off of 2.44 U/mL, anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 86.5%, with a sensitivity of 85.8% and specificity of 87.1%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, these autoantibodies were independently associated with UC (OR 36.18, 95% CI 17.0–83.0, p = 4.86 × 10 −19 ) and demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to ANCA and ASCA status (Akaike information criterion 184.8 vs. 252.4). Positivity rates followed a gradient across the Montreal classification, increasing from ileal (L1: 7.9%) and ileocolonic (L3: 8.1%) CD towards colonic CD (L2: 43.8%) and UC: 85.8% ( p = 2.04 × 10 −31 ). Conclusions Anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and outperform conventional serological markers in distinguishing UC from CD. Importantly, this study provides the first direct comparison with ANCA and ASCA status within the same patient cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70926
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti‐Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibodies Distinguish Ulcerative Colitis From Crohn's Disease With High Diagnostic Accuracy and Outperform ANCA and ASCA Status: A Prospective Cross‐Sectional Study

Peter Schönenberger, Jakob Heimer, Marius König, Samuel Truniger et al.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Anti‐Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibodies Distinguish Ulcerative Colitis From Crohn's Disease With High Diagnostic Accuracy and Outperform ANCA and ASCA Status: A Prospective Cross‐Sectional Study

Peter Schönenberger, Jakob Heimer, Marius König, Samuel Truniger, Claudia Krieger‐Grübel, Nicola Frei, Seraina Koller, Simon Woelfel, Stephan Brand, Regine García Boy, Isabelle Kamm, Christina Lins, Alfred Mahr, Matthias Friedrich, Joel Dütschler, David Waber
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Reliable biomarkers to distinguish ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) remain limited. Aims To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies for differentiating UC from CD and to compare their performance with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and anti‐ Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA). Methods In this prospective cross‐sectional study in patients with UC and CD, serum anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies, ASCA, and ANCA were measured and clinical data were collected. The primary outcome was the accuracy of anti‐integrin αvβ6 antibodies in distinguishing UC from CD. Secondary analyses compared their performance with ASCA and ANCA status and across IBD subgroups. Results A total of 224 patients were included (UC: n = 106, CD: n = 118, male: 63.8%, median age: 43.5 years). Patients with indeterminate colitis were excluded. At a cut‐off of 2.44 U/mL, anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 86.5%, with a sensitivity of 85.8% and specificity of 87.1%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, these autoantibodies were independently associated with UC (OR 36.18, 95% CI 17.0–83.0, p = 4.86 × 10 −19 ) and demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to ANCA and ASCA status (Akaike information criterion 184.8 vs. 252.4). Positivity rates followed a gradient across the Montreal classification, increasing from ileal (L1: 7.9%) and ileocolonic (L3: 8.1%) CD towards colonic CD (L2: 43.8%) and UC: 85.8% ( p = 2.04 × 10 −31 ). Conclusions Anti‐integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and outperform conventional serological markers in distinguishing UC from CD. Importantly, this study provides the first direct comparison with ANCA and ASCA status within the same patient cohort.

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Inserm (FR), University of St.Gallen (CH), Université Paris Cité (FR), University of Oxford (GB), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), OST - Ostschweizer Fachhochschule (CH), Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (DE), Ostschweizer Kinderspital (CH), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.