What recovery-enabling services for psychosis should do: a multi-informant focus group study

Background Recovery-oriented care is widely promoted but remains difficult to realize in routine psychosis services, particularly in hospital-centered systems. The authors aimed to identify broadly supported service actions to embed recovery principles in daily practice in Flanders, Belgium.Methods Twelve focus groups were conducted in two waves with purposively sampled stakeholders: service users (n = 19), relatives (n = 20), bachelor-level staff (n = 20), and MSc/MD-level professionals (n = 18). Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis by a four-researcher team.Results Analysis yielded 13 action points, emphasizing: (1) warm welcome and caring style; (2) dialogical practice; (3) small-scale, everyday living together; (4) centering the person’s trajectory and meaning of experiences; (5) continuity of relationships; (6) patience and pace-matching; (7) involving the social context while safeguarding confidentiality; (8) structural inclusion of peer experts; (9) co-creation and shared decision-making; (10) de-escalation and dialogical crisis work; (11) professional containment of anxiety through supervision and reflective team cultures; (12) shared responsibility rather than rigid procedure enforcement; and (13) community connection and warm handovers. Subgroups differed in emphasis, yet expressed broadly overlapping views.Discussion The actions form a practicable framework for recovery-supporting psychosis care and can inform training, service standards, quality improvement, and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychosis
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2026.2679997
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What recovery-enabling services for psychosis should do: a multi-informant focus group study

Jim van Os, Bart Rabaey, Kim Steeman, Philippe Delespaul et al.
Psychosis
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

What recovery-enabling services for psychosis should do: a multi-informant focus group study

Jim van Os, Bart Rabaey, Kim Steeman, Philippe Delespaul, Evi Verbeke, Jasper Feyaerts, Stijn Vanheule, Margot de Sloover, Leen Verhaert, Inez Germeys, Peter Dierinck
article en

Abstract

Background Recovery-oriented care is widely promoted but remains difficult to realize in routine psychosis services, particularly in hospital-centered systems. The authors aimed to identify broadly supported service actions to embed recovery principles in daily practice in Flanders, Belgium.Methods Twelve focus groups were conducted in two waves with purposively sampled stakeholders: service users (n = 19), relatives (n = 20), bachelor-level staff (n = 20), and MSc/MD-level professionals (n = 18). Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis by a four-researcher team.Results Analysis yielded 13 action points, emphasizing: (1) warm welcome and caring style; (2) dialogical practice; (3) small-scale, everyday living together; (4) centering the person’s trajectory and meaning of experiences; (5) continuity of relationships; (6) patience and pace-matching; (7) involving the social context while safeguarding confidentiality; (8) structural inclusion of peer experts; (9) co-creation and shared decision-making; (10) de-escalation and dialogical crisis work; (11) professional containment of anxiety through supervision and reflective team cultures; (12) shared responsibility rather than rigid procedure enforcement; and (13) community connection and warm handovers. Subgroups differed in emphasis, yet expressed broadly overlapping views.Discussion The actions form a practicable framework for recovery-supporting psychosis care and can inform training, service standards, quality improvement, and policy.

Psychosis
Utrecht University (NL), Ghent University Hospital (BE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Province of Antwerp (BE), Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg (BE), Sirris (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.