Post-sentence supervision orders in Australia: An instrument of perpetual re-criminalisation

New generation post-sentence preventive detention and supervision regimes recently enacted in Australia are a hybrid of civil and penal law elements. The laws allow for the correctional supervision, in prison or the community, of certain offenders deemed serious or high-risk at completion of their sentences – what amounts to an exceptional expansion of penal power beyond conventional notions of punishment and justified in the interest of community protection. In this article, these regimes are examined as a distinctive modality of criminalisation and penal power. Where most attention tends to be on post-sentence detention, we focus on supervision orders, which are far more common in Australia, yet their current administration and impacts are widely overlooked in the critical literature. Our study reveals that they play a crucial, and largely hidden, role in re-criminalising some individuals while arguably doing little that is positive to protect the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Punishment & Society
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745261477111
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-sentence supervision orders in Australia: An instrument of perpetual re-criminalisation

Lindsay Farmer, Arlie Loughnan, Luke McNamara, Julia Quilter et al.
Punishment & Society
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Post-sentence supervision orders in Australia: An instrument of perpetual re-criminalisation

Lindsay Farmer, Arlie Loughnan, Luke McNamara, Julia Quilter, Russell Hogg, David Brown, Lucy Crawford
article en

Abstract

New generation post-sentence preventive detention and supervision regimes recently enacted in Australia are a hybrid of civil and penal law elements. The laws allow for the correctional supervision, in prison or the community, of certain offenders deemed serious or high-risk at completion of their sentences – what amounts to an exceptional expansion of penal power beyond conventional notions of punishment and justified in the interest of community protection. In this article, these regimes are examined as a distinctive modality of criminalisation and penal power. Where most attention tends to be on post-sentence detention, we focus on supervision orders, which are far more common in Australia, yet their current administration and impacts are widely overlooked in the critical literature. Our study reveals that they play a crucial, and largely hidden, role in re-criminalising some individuals while arguably doing little that is positive to protect the community.

Punishment & Society
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU), University of Glasgow (GB)
Australian Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Post-sentence supervision orders in Australia: An instrument of perpetual re-criminalisation — Lindsay Farmer, Arlie Loughnan, et al. · Punishment & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS