The “Too-Few Elephant Problem”: Quantitative Analysis of Historical Elephant Tree-Toppling Rates Across Africa

Abstract Elephants were a major driver of tree stem mortality in Africa, but their impacts are now spatially constrained and they no longer topple trees across the continent. Thus, most African landscapes lack a key ecological agent that helped maintain diversity and functioning. Even ecologists living in Africa fail to anticipate the rampant destruction of trees that can occur when elephants live in and move through landscapes. If we can build in a consensus on the degree of above-ground tree turnover that is inherent in different contexts, it would inform restoration projects and ecological definitions of degradation. We collated empirical data on treefall in ecosystems with and without elephants and predicted past tree loss spatially. The metrics used (%trees or #trees ha −1 ) reveal assumptions about the processes controlling elephant damage. On average elephants knock down 5.4 [IQR 3.0–8.3] % of the trees in an ecosystem per annum. Mapping this into places that no longer contain elephants reveals the above-ground biomass turnover that would have been the norm for millennia before elephants were widely exterminated. On average, this is ~ 1/3 of woody biomass production but at a local scale it can often exceed production. There is an urgent need for better theory on elephant tree interactions, and restoration projects should embrace the rapid turnover dynamics these ecosystems evolved with.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystems
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-026-01089-5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Too-Few Elephant Problem”: Quantitative Analysis of Historical Elephant Tree-Toppling Rates Across Africa

Casey M. Ryan, Domingos Fortunato P.F. Silva, Sally Archibald, Katherine Bunney et al.
Ecosystems
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

The “Too-Few Elephant Problem”: Quantitative Analysis of Historical Elephant Tree-Toppling Rates Across Africa

Casey M. Ryan, Domingos Fortunato P.F. Silva, Sally Archibald, Katherine Bunney, Norman Owen-Smith, Caitlin Ransom, Robert Guldemond, Anya P. Courtenay, Penny Mograbi, Fezile Mtsetfwa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Elephants were a major driver of tree stem mortality in Africa, but their impacts are now spatially constrained and they no longer topple trees across the continent. Thus, most African landscapes lack a key ecological agent that helped maintain diversity and functioning. Even ecologists living in Africa fail to anticipate the rampant destruction of trees that can occur when elephants live in and move through landscapes. If we can build in a consensus on the degree of above-ground tree turnover that is inherent in different contexts, it would inform restoration projects and ecological definitions of degradation. We collated empirical data on treefall in ecosystems with and without elephants and predicted past tree loss spatially. The metrics used (%trees or #trees ha −1 ) reveal assumptions about the processes controlling elephant damage. On average elephants knock down 5.4 [IQR 3.0–8.3] % of the trees in an ecosystem per annum. Mapping this into places that no longer contain elephants reveals the above-ground biomass turnover that would have been the norm for millennia before elephants were widely exterminated. On average, this is ~ 1/3 of woody biomass production but at a local scale it can often exceed production. There is an urgent need for better theory on elephant tree interactions, and restoration projects should embrace the rapid turnover dynamics these ecosystems evolved with.

EcosystemsVol. 29(5)
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Utrecht University (NL), Institut für Sozialforschung und Sozialwirtschaft (DE), South African Environmental Observation Network (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.