Development and evaluation of a quality assessment tool for equality, diversity, and inclusion (QUALITY-EDI) within healthcare research

Implementing equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in healthcare research is critical to ensuring findings are translatable and provide the greatest benefit to patients who need it most. A quality assessment scoring tool (QUALITY-EDI) was developed to evaluate the conduct of EDI in healthcare research across all stages of the research cycle. To achieve this, a multidisciplinary working group comprising 22 members was established, including clinicians, researchers, and patient and public advocates. Using the National Institute for Health and Care Research’s Research Support Service EDI toolkit as an initial framework, a workshop with 16 public representatives co-designed elements of the proposed QUALITY-EDI tool. The tool was subsequently refined by the working group to have eight domains: research context; study design; data collection; data analysis and interpretation; knowledge mobilisation; research team diversity; patient and public involvement; and budgeting for research inclusion. QUALITY-EDI can be used by researchers, journal editors, reviewers, funders, lay members, and other interest holders to assess and monitor the quality of EDI implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-100612
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development and evaluation of a quality assessment tool for equality, diversity, and inclusion (QUALITY-EDI) within healthcare research

Caoimhe M. Walsh, Hannah Kettley-Linsell, Linda D. Sharples, Michael G Fadel et al.
BMJ
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Development and evaluation of a quality assessment tool for equality, diversity, and inclusion (QUALITY-EDI) within healthcare research

Caoimhe M. Walsh, Hannah Kettley-Linsell, Linda D. Sharples, Michael G Fadel, Brian David Nicholson, Anthony Muchai Manyara, P M M Bossuyt, Sally Hopewell, Tanvi Rai, Jérémie F. Cohen, Darshali A. Vyas, Rebecca Barnes, Peter Buckle, George B Hanna, Suzanne Bull, Anukriti Panda, Piers Boshier, Kelly Gleason, Christopher Newby, Warren Sims, Amanda J Cross, Vivian Welch
article en

Abstract

Implementing equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in healthcare research is critical to ensuring findings are translatable and provide the greatest benefit to patients who need it most. A quality assessment scoring tool (QUALITY-EDI) was developed to evaluate the conduct of EDI in healthcare research across all stages of the research cycle. To achieve this, a multidisciplinary working group comprising 22 members was established, including clinicians, researchers, and patient and public advocates. Using the National Institute for Health and Care Research’s Research Support Service EDI toolkit as an initial framework, a workshop with 16 public representatives co-designed elements of the proposed QUALITY-EDI tool. The tool was subsequently refined by the working group to have eight domains: research context; study design; data collection; data analysis and interpretation; knowledge mobilisation; research team diversity; patient and public involvement; and budgeting for research inclusion. QUALITY-EDI can be used by researchers, journal editors, reviewers, funders, lay members, and other interest holders to assess and monitor the quality of EDI implementation.

BMJVol. 394
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR), University of Nottingham (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Leicester (GB), University of Ottawa (CA), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique (FR), Bruyere Health Research Institute (CA), Imperial College London (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.