Incubating Revolution: How Social Networks and the Built Environment Sustain Mobilization

How do challengers sustain mobilization under conditions of extreme repression? Social networks and the built environment are critical, interacting at two time scales. Settlement, chain migration, and everyday cooperation produce dense relational environments that shape motivations and constitute latent resources. When contention erupts, those dense social networks can be repurposed to sustain high-risk collective action, providing shelter, escape routes, information, and support. But their efficacy is limited without the organic built environment in which they form; its proximity, limited visibility, and constrained access amplify the effect of dense social ties in facilitating challenge under threat. We substantiate these claims using disaggregated data on protest in Damascus during the 2011 Syrian uprising, finding that neighbourhoods with both dense networks and organic built form exhibit significantly more frequent and confrontational mobilization. By analytically separating the social from the spatial, this article illuminates the mechanisms through which urban neighbourhoods become incubators of rebellion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261500259
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incubating Revolution: How Social Networks and the Built Environment Sustain Mobilization

Kevin Mazur, Motasem Abuzaid
Comparative Political Studies
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Incubating Revolution: How Social Networks and the Built Environment Sustain Mobilization

Kevin Mazur, Motasem Abuzaid
article en

Abstract

How do challengers sustain mobilization under conditions of extreme repression? Social networks and the built environment are critical, interacting at two time scales. Settlement, chain migration, and everyday cooperation produce dense relational environments that shape motivations and constitute latent resources. When contention erupts, those dense social networks can be repurposed to sustain high-risk collective action, providing shelter, escape routes, information, and support. But their efficacy is limited without the organic built environment in which they form; its proximity, limited visibility, and constrained access amplify the effect of dense social ties in facilitating challenge under threat. We substantiate these claims using disaggregated data on protest in Damascus during the 2011 Syrian uprising, finding that neighbourhoods with both dense networks and organic built form exhibit significantly more frequent and confrontational mobilization. By analytically separating the social from the spatial, this article illuminates the mechanisms through which urban neighbourhoods become incubators of rebellion.

Comparative Political Studies
King's College London (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
University of Cambridge
Sustainable cities and communities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon