High-risk ≠ mandatory prophylaxis: a real-world study of 274 PVP patients who omitted antimicrobial prophylaxis

Abstract Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) are infrequent but can have serious consequences. Current guidelines suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis “may be considered” for high-risk patients undergoing PVP due to the implantation of bone cement. However, in practice, this conditional recommendation is often misinterpreted as a requirement, resulting in unnecessary antibiotic use. This study aimed to assess the safety of omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis in high-risk PVP patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent PVP at a tertiary hospital between January 2024 and January 2026. These patients did not receive preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and had at least 90 days of follow-up. The decision to omit prophylaxis was made by a clinical pharmacist during a preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. This decision was based on the absence of active infection, indicated by no fever, no identifiable infectious focus, and normal procalcitonin levels when measured. The primary outcome was a 90-day SSI, defined by US CDC criteria, which includes a 90-day surveillance window for procedures involving implant placement. Postoperative follow-up was conducted via telephone, and patients were instructed to return immediately if they experienced wound redness, purulent discharge, fever, or any other signs of infection. Results The percentage of PVP procedures performed without antimicrobial prophylaxis rose from 52.2% (117/224) in 2024 to 66.3% (136/205) in 2025, and further increased to 87.5% (21/24) by January 2026. Throughout the study period (January 2024–January 2026), 274 PVP patients did not receive preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Of these patients, 103 (37.6%) were aged 75 or older, 35 (12.8%) had diabetes mellitus, 21 (7.7%) had malignancy, 79 (28.8%) had chronic pulmonary disease, and 2 (0.7%) had hypoalbuminaemia. Three patients had both diabetes and malignancy. All 274 patients completed a 90-day follow-up, and none developed a surgical site infection. The 90-day SSI rate was 0% (95% CI 0–1.35%). Conclusions Once active infection is definitively ruled out, antimicrobial prophylaxis can be safely omitted, even for patients with conventional risk factors like advanced age, diabetes, and malignancy. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, led by pharmacists and centered on confirming the absence of active infection, offers a safe and practical strategy for managing perioperative antimicrobial use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07180-w
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-risk ≠ mandatory prophylaxis: a real-world study of 274 PVP patients who omitted antimicrobial prophylaxis

Yin Xiang-hui
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

High-risk ≠ mandatory prophylaxis: a real-world study of 274 PVP patients who omitted antimicrobial prophylaxis

Yin Xiang-hui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) are infrequent but can have serious consequences. Current guidelines suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis “may be considered” for high-risk patients undergoing PVP due to the implantation of bone cement. However, in practice, this conditional recommendation is often misinterpreted as a requirement, resulting in unnecessary antibiotic use. This study aimed to assess the safety of omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis in high-risk PVP patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent PVP at a tertiary hospital between January 2024 and January 2026. These patients did not receive preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and had at least 90 days of follow-up. The decision to omit prophylaxis was made by a clinical pharmacist during a preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. This decision was based on the absence of active infection, indicated by no fever, no identifiable infectious focus, and normal procalcitonin levels when measured. The primary outcome was a 90-day SSI, defined by US CDC criteria, which includes a 90-day surveillance window for procedures involving implant placement. Postoperative follow-up was conducted via telephone, and patients were instructed to return immediately if they experienced wound redness, purulent discharge, fever, or any other signs of infection. Results The percentage of PVP procedures performed without antimicrobial prophylaxis rose from 52.2% (117/224) in 2024 to 66.3% (136/205) in 2025, and further increased to 87.5% (21/24) by January 2026. Throughout the study period (January 2024–January 2026), 274 PVP patients did not receive preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Of these patients, 103 (37.6%) were aged 75 or older, 35 (12.8%) had diabetes mellitus, 21 (7.7%) had malignancy, 79 (28.8%) had chronic pulmonary disease, and 2 (0.7%) had hypoalbuminaemia. Three patients had both diabetes and malignancy. All 274 patients completed a 90-day follow-up, and none developed a surgical site infection. The 90-day SSI rate was 0% (95% CI 0–1.35%). Conclusions Once active infection is definitively ruled out, antimicrobial prophylaxis can be safely omitted, even for patients with conventional risk factors like advanced age, diabetes, and malignancy. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, led by pharmacists and centered on confirming the absence of active infection, offers a safe and practical strategy for managing perioperative antimicrobial use.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Hunan Normal University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.