Peer support in people with type 2 diabetes

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based peer support intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes, focusing on diabetes-related distress, self-care, well-being, and health-related quality of life. In this randomized controlled trial, participants were allocated to either a group-based peer support intervention—consisting of six sessions led by peer leaders and psychotherapists—or a single educational meeting. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six months, and twelve months using self-reported questionnaires. Differences between the intervention and control groups were analyzed using linear multilevel models. Out of 1,404 individuals with type 2 diabetes who were invited, 269 (19.2%) expressed willingness to participate, and 225 (16.0%) completed the baseline questionnaire and were enrolled. Participants who consented generally had higher educational levels. Among those in the intervention group, 62.7% attended three or more sessions. The intervention led to improved well-being (0.99; 95%CI:-0.02–2.00) and higher frequency of foot care days per week (0.50; 95%CI 0.06–0.94). However, there were no differences between the groups regarding diabetes-related distress, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, or the other self-care domains. The results showed only limited benefits for people with T2D, the findings suggest the need for better targeting of interventions and strategies to improve engagement and participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65877-8
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer support in people with type 2 diabetes

Petra J. M. Elders, Amber A. van der Heijden, Sabrina J.G.C. Welten, Caroline Baan
Scientific Reports
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Peer support in people with type 2 diabetes

Petra J. M. Elders, Amber A. van der Heijden, Sabrina J.G.C. Welten, Caroline Baan
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based peer support intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes, focusing on diabetes-related distress, self-care, well-being, and health-related quality of life. In this randomized controlled trial, participants were allocated to either a group-based peer support intervention—consisting of six sessions led by peer leaders and psychotherapists—or a single educational meeting. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six months, and twelve months using self-reported questionnaires. Differences between the intervention and control groups were analyzed using linear multilevel models. Out of 1,404 individuals with type 2 diabetes who were invited, 269 (19.2%) expressed willingness to participate, and 225 (16.0%) completed the baseline questionnaire and were enrolled. Participants who consented generally had higher educational levels. Among those in the intervention group, 62.7% attended three or more sessions. The intervention led to improved well-being (0.99; 95%CI:-0.02–2.00) and higher frequency of foot care days per week (0.50; 95%CI 0.06–0.94). However, there were no differences between the groups regarding diabetes-related distress, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, or the other self-care domains. The results showed only limited benefits for people with T2D, the findings suggest the need for better targeting of interventions and strategies to improve engagement and participation.

Scientific Reports
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Diabetes Fonds
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.