Do Momentary Stress and Busyness Predict Naturalistic Prospective Memory Differently in Younger and Older Adults?

ABSTRACT Everyday prospective memory (PM), such as remembering medication intake or appointments, is crucial for independence and quality of life, especially in older age. However, little is known about how momentary stress and busyness as contextual factors differentially affect naturalistic PM. Forty younger (18–27 years) and 40 older adults (60–84 years) completed a 14‐day ambulatory assessment of various naturalistic PM tasks, alongside time‐contingent reports of stress and busyness. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed within‐person effects: stress was related to lower time‐based but higher event‐based PM, while busyness was related to higher event‐based PM and self‐assigned intentions. Effects of stress but not busyness were stronger in older adults. Older adults performed comparably to or better than younger adults on most tasks. Importantly, accounting for busyness and stress eliminated age differences in time‐based PM. Findings highlight task‐specific and differential effects of stress and busyness and demonstrate how their daily fluctuations shape age‐related PM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70275
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Momentary Stress and Busyness Predict Naturalistic Prospective Memory Differently in Younger and Older Adults?

Maximilian Haas, Nicola Ballhausen
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Do Momentary Stress and Busyness Predict Naturalistic Prospective Memory Differently in Younger and Older Adults?

Maximilian Haas, Nicola Ballhausen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Everyday prospective memory (PM), such as remembering medication intake or appointments, is crucial for independence and quality of life, especially in older age. However, little is known about how momentary stress and busyness as contextual factors differentially affect naturalistic PM. Forty younger (18–27 years) and 40 older adults (60–84 years) completed a 14‐day ambulatory assessment of various naturalistic PM tasks, alongside time‐contingent reports of stress and busyness. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed within‐person effects: stress was related to lower time‐based but higher event‐based PM, while busyness was related to higher event‐based PM and self‐assigned intentions. Effects of stress but not busyness were stronger in older adults. Older adults performed comparably to or better than younger adults on most tasks. Importantly, accounting for busyness and stress eliminated age differences in time‐based PM. Findings highlight task‐specific and differential effects of stress and busyness and demonstrate how their daily fluctuations shape age‐related PM.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(5)
University of Geneva (CH), Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.