Deep learning methods to analyse knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

This systematic review focuses on understanding the evidence of validity of deep learning (DL) methods utilized to analyze knee osteoarthritis (OA) disease using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). A search was made in three scientific databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) from January-1990 to March-2025 with the following keywords: Knee, Osteoarthritis, Deep Learning, Automatic, and MRI. Studies based on the key string search, inclusion, and exclusion criteria emphasizing the assessment and synthesis of DL methods using MRI for knee OA were only considered. Categorization of the outcome is based on five problem areas addressed: segmentation, classification, synthesis, registration, and outlier detection. A total of 56 studies were selected and critically assessed based on the problems associated with knee MRI for knee OA evaluation. The segmentation problem was addressed in 39 studies, classification in 14, registration in two, and synthesis in six studies. In addition, four studies simultaneously addressed segmentation and classification problems, while one study combined registration and segmentation tasks. Findings were synthesized using a structured synthesis without meta-analysis, informed by Cochrane guidance for reviews. Segmentation continues to be the predominant area of study, followed by classification. Most studies utilized a specific MR sequence and a specific dataset thereby leading to data-dependent DL methods. There is insufficient literature reporting unsupervised, interpretable, and explainable DL methods. In conclusion, standardization of validity and introduction of reliability measures is essential to ensure trustworthiness of these DL methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10292-3
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning methods to analyse knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

Bhushan Borotikar, Surabhi Thatte, Sachin Tapasvi
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Deep learning methods to analyse knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

Bhushan Borotikar, Surabhi Thatte, Sachin Tapasvi
article en

Abstract

This systematic review focuses on understanding the evidence of validity of deep learning (DL) methods utilized to analyze knee osteoarthritis (OA) disease using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). A search was made in three scientific databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) from January-1990 to March-2025 with the following keywords: Knee, Osteoarthritis, Deep Learning, Automatic, and MRI. Studies based on the key string search, inclusion, and exclusion criteria emphasizing the assessment and synthesis of DL methods using MRI for knee OA were only considered. Categorization of the outcome is based on five problem areas addressed: segmentation, classification, synthesis, registration, and outlier detection. A total of 56 studies were selected and critically assessed based on the problems associated with knee MRI for knee OA evaluation. The segmentation problem was addressed in 39 studies, classification in 14, registration in two, and synthesis in six studies. In addition, four studies simultaneously addressed segmentation and classification problems, while one study combined registration and segmentation tasks. Findings were synthesized using a structured synthesis without meta-analysis, informed by Cochrane guidance for reviews. Segmentation continues to be the predominant area of study, followed by classification. Most studies utilized a specific MR sequence and a specific dataset thereby leading to data-dependent DL methods. There is insufficient literature reporting unsupervised, interpretable, and explainable DL methods. In conclusion, standardization of validity and introduction of reliability measures is essential to ensure trustworthiness of these DL methods.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
University of Cape Town (ZA), Symbiosis International University (IN), IMT Atlantique (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep learning methods to analyse knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis — Bhushan Borotikar, Surabhi Thatte, et al. · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS