A Strategic Governance Framework for NFZ Performance, Accountability, and Resource Allocation in Poland’s Public Healthcare System

Poland's public healthcare system faces persistent challenges related to waiting times, workforce constraints, regional disparities, hospital financial pressures, and the allocation of limited healthcare resources. Within this system, the National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia, NFZ) performs a central financing and purchasing role, yet resource allocation, performance measurement, institutional accountability, and strategic feedback are not always examined within a unified management architecture. This study develops the NFZ Strategic Governance Framework (NFZ-SGF) to integrate these functions within a single conceptual model of public healthcare governance. The study applies a structured conceptual-analytical design combining institutional analysis, secondary indicator mapping, policy benchmarking, and synthesis of literature on strategic purchasing, health-system performance, resource allocation, and public-sector accountability. The resulting framework connects population health needs, needs-sensitive resource allocation, strategic purchasing, healthcare delivery, multidimensional performance assessment, diagnostic accountability, and strategic feedback. Five performance domains-access, efficiency, quality, equity, and sustainability-are incorporated into the model, while resource allocation is conceptualised as a function of population, demographic structure, morbidity, socioeconomic need, workforce capacity, and utilisation or accessibility pressure. A central contribution of the study is the concept of diagnostic accountability, defined as the assignment of corrective responsibility to the institutional level possessing both the authority and practical capacity to influence the mechanism underlying an identified performance problem. NFZ-SGF consequently reframes performance information from a primarily retrospective reporting function into an input for subsequent purchasing, allocation, and corrective decision-making. The framework is conceptual rather than empirically validated and does not constitute an operational NFZ funding algorithm or establish causal effects on healthcare outcomes. Instead, it provides a testable strategic governance architecture and an empirical research agenda for evaluating regional allocation, purchasing performance, institutional accountability, and adaptive resource governance within Poland's public healthcare system. The study argues that the strategic effectiveness of public healthcare purchasing depends not simply on the availability of financial resources or performance data, but on the institutional capacity to connect healthcare needs, resources, purchasing decisions, performance evidence, accountable decision-makers, and subsequent corrective action.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business and Management
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v21n6p111
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Strategic Governance Framework for NFZ Performance, Accountability, and Resource Allocation in Poland’s Public Healthcare System

Dawid Prestini
1 links
International Journal of Business and Management
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

A Strategic Governance Framework for NFZ Performance, Accountability, and Resource Allocation in Poland’s Public Healthcare System

Dawid Prestini
article en

Abstract

Poland's public healthcare system faces persistent challenges related to waiting times, workforce constraints, regional disparities, hospital financial pressures, and the allocation of limited healthcare resources. Within this system, the National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia, NFZ) performs a central financing and purchasing role, yet resource allocation, performance measurement, institutional accountability, and strategic feedback are not always examined within a unified management architecture. This study develops the NFZ Strategic Governance Framework (NFZ-SGF) to integrate these functions within a single conceptual model of public healthcare governance. The study applies a structured conceptual-analytical design combining institutional analysis, secondary indicator mapping, policy benchmarking, and synthesis of literature on strategic purchasing, health-system performance, resource allocation, and public-sector accountability. The resulting framework connects population health needs, needs-sensitive resource allocation, strategic purchasing, healthcare delivery, multidimensional performance assessment, diagnostic accountability, and strategic feedback. Five performance domains-access, efficiency, quality, equity, and sustainability-are incorporated into the model, while resource allocation is conceptualised as a function of population, demographic structure, morbidity, socioeconomic need, workforce capacity, and utilisation or accessibility pressure. A central contribution of the study is the concept of diagnostic accountability, defined as the assignment of corrective responsibility to the institutional level possessing both the authority and practical capacity to influence the mechanism underlying an identified performance problem. NFZ-SGF consequently reframes performance information from a primarily retrospective reporting function into an input for subsequent purchasing, allocation, and corrective decision-making. The framework is conceptual rather than empirically validated and does not constitute an operational NFZ funding algorithm or establish causal effects on healthcare outcomes. Instead, it provides a testable strategic governance architecture and an empirical research agenda for evaluating regional allocation, purchasing performance, institutional accountability, and adaptive resource governance within Poland's public healthcare system. The study argues that the strategic effectiveness of public healthcare purchasing depends not simply on the availability of financial resources or performance data, but on the institutional capacity to connect healthcare needs, resources, purchasing decisions, performance evidence, accountable decision-makers, and subsequent corrective action.

International Journal of Business and ManagementVol. 21(6)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon