Safety and feasibility of telesurgical robot assisted radical prostatectomy: prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and operational reliability of a standardized telesurgical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) programme performed between two Belgian institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective pilot study included 20 patients undergoing RARP (10 telesurgical and 10 contemporaneous matched on-site reference procedures) performed between two Belgian institutions, AZORG Hospital and Orsi Academy. The primary endpoint was intraoperative safety, assessed using the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes; postoperative recovery; pathological, biochemical, and functional outcomes; and telesurgery-specific technical parameters (network latency, system reliability, and surgeon-reported usability and workload). RESULTS: All telesurgical procedures were completed successfully without intraoperative adverse events or local takeover. Median operative time was 155 (interquartile range 140-180) min, and median estimated blood loss was 325 (interquartile range 200-400) mL. No major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred. Pathological, biochemical, and early functional outcomes following telesurgical RARP were within the range observed in the contemporaneous reference cohort. Mean network latency was 10.7 ± 5.3 ms, mean jitter was 4 ms, and packet loss remained below 0.05% throughout all procedures. One transient connection interruption occurred, without clinical consequences, and all procedures were completed successfully. Surgeon-reported usability and workload scores were favourable. CONCLUSION: This prospective pilot study provides early clinical evidence that telesurgical RARP can be safely implemented under stable low-latency conditions. These findings support the clinical applicability of telesurgery, providing a framework for larger-scale evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70430
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and feasibility of telesurgical robot assisted radical prostatectomy: prospective pilot study

Federico Lavagno, Claudio Brancelli, Ruben De Groote, Edoardo Beatrici et al.
British Journal of Urology
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Safety and feasibility of telesurgical robot assisted radical prostatectomy: prospective pilot study

Federico Lavagno, Claudio Brancelli, Ruben De Groote, Edoardo Beatrici, Alessio Guidotti, Attilio Barretta, Mario de Angelis, Valerio Santarelli, Francesco Prata, Nicola Frego, Pieter De Backer, Geert De Naeyer, Nicolas Carl, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, V. Cavarra, P. Pasquini, Edward LAMBERT, Francesco Pepillo, Niki Rashidian, Francesco Cei, Frederiek D'Hondt, Alexandre Mottrie
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and operational reliability of a standardized telesurgical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) programme performed between two Belgian institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective pilot study included 20 patients undergoing RARP (10 telesurgical and 10 contemporaneous matched on-site reference procedures) performed between two Belgian institutions, AZORG Hospital and Orsi Academy. The primary endpoint was intraoperative safety, assessed using the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes; postoperative recovery; pathological, biochemical, and functional outcomes; and telesurgery-specific technical parameters (network latency, system reliability, and surgeon-reported usability and workload). RESULTS: All telesurgical procedures were completed successfully without intraoperative adverse events or local takeover. Median operative time was 155 (interquartile range 140-180) min, and median estimated blood loss was 325 (interquartile range 200-400) mL. No major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred. Pathological, biochemical, and early functional outcomes following telesurgical RARP were within the range observed in the contemporaneous reference cohort. Mean network latency was 10.7 ± 5.3 ms, mean jitter was 4 ms, and packet loss remained below 0.05% throughout all procedures. One transient connection interruption occurred, without clinical consequences, and all procedures were completed successfully. Surgeon-reported usability and workload scores were favourable. CONCLUSION: This prospective pilot study provides early clinical evidence that telesurgical RARP can be safely implemented under stable low-latency conditions. These findings support the clinical applicability of telesurgery, providing a framework for larger-scale evaluations.

British Journal of Urology
Ghent University (BE), Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), ORSI Academy (BE), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.