Association between third molar agenesis and sagittal skeletal discrepancies in an orthodontic patient population

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported differences in the prevalence of tooth agenesis according to sagittal skeletal discrepancies, while third molars have often not been considered. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between third molar agenesis and sagittal skeletal discrepancies. Methods This cross-sectional study comprised 484 orthodontic patients. Pre-orthodontic lateral cephalometric radiographs were digitally analyzed using OnyxCeph³. SNA, SNB, and ANB angles were determined, and the skeletal classification based on ANB was performed as Class I, Class II, and Class III. In addition, sagittal jaw positions were classified as retrognathic, orthognathic, or prognathic. Third molar agenesis was evaluated on panoramic radiographs. The control group consisted exclusively of individuals with a complete permanent dentition of 32 teeth. Statistical analysis was performed at α = 0.05. Results A total 244 females and 240 males were included: 216 patients had skeletal Class I malocclusion, 201 had skeletal Class II malocclusion, and 67 had skeletal Class III malocclusion. A total of 117 patients had third molar agenesis. Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion showed a higher prevalence of third molar agenesis (total) ( p = 0.0086) and a higher prevalence of maxillary third molar agenesis ( p = 0.0003). The number of missing third molars ranged from 1 to 4, and a statistically significant difference was observed, with patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion showing a higher number of missing third molars compared with patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion ( p = 0.0309) and skeletal Class I malocclusion ( p = 0.0432). Logistic regression analysis was performed, in which gender and age were included in the model as covariates showed that Skeletal class III malocclusion remained associated with third molar agenesis ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Third molar agenesis was significantly more prevalent in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09539-1
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between third molar agenesis and sagittal skeletal discrepancies in an orthodontic patient population

Svenja Beisel-Memmert, Christian Kirschneck, Eva Paddenberg, Philipp Schnegelsberg et al.
BMC Oral Health
dental development and anomalies
article

Association between third molar agenesis and sagittal skeletal discrepancies in an orthodontic patient population

Svenja Beisel-Memmert, Christian Kirschneck, Eva Paddenberg, Philipp Schnegelsberg, Peter Proff, Erika Calvano Küchler, Theodosia Bartzela, Nikola Sophie Ortner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported differences in the prevalence of tooth agenesis according to sagittal skeletal discrepancies, while third molars have often not been considered. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between third molar agenesis and sagittal skeletal discrepancies. Methods This cross-sectional study comprised 484 orthodontic patients. Pre-orthodontic lateral cephalometric radiographs were digitally analyzed using OnyxCeph³. SNA, SNB, and ANB angles were determined, and the skeletal classification based on ANB was performed as Class I, Class II, and Class III. In addition, sagittal jaw positions were classified as retrognathic, orthognathic, or prognathic. Third molar agenesis was evaluated on panoramic radiographs. The control group consisted exclusively of individuals with a complete permanent dentition of 32 teeth. Statistical analysis was performed at α = 0.05. Results A total 244 females and 240 males were included: 216 patients had skeletal Class I malocclusion, 201 had skeletal Class II malocclusion, and 67 had skeletal Class III malocclusion. A total of 117 patients had third molar agenesis. Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion showed a higher prevalence of third molar agenesis (total) ( p = 0.0086) and a higher prevalence of maxillary third molar agenesis ( p = 0.0003). The number of missing third molars ranged from 1 to 4, and a statistically significant difference was observed, with patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion showing a higher number of missing third molars compared with patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion ( p = 0.0309) and skeletal Class I malocclusion ( p = 0.0432). Logistic regression analysis was performed, in which gender and age were included in the model as covariates showed that Skeletal class III malocclusion remained associated with third molar agenesis ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Third molar agenesis was significantly more prevalent in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.