Beyond Plastic Labels: Polymer-Aware Substrate Encoding Improves Plastizyme Prediction and Reliability Models

Abstract Machine learning is increasingly being used to identify plastic-degrading enzymes (plastizymes), yet systematic evaluations of how different protein and polymer representations influence predictive performance, generalization, and computational cost remain lacking. Here, we systematically evaluated protein–polymer representation strategies using a curated data set of 720 enzyme–polymer interactions spanning seven polymer families. Handcrafted and learned protein and polymer representations, including transformer-based embeddings, graph representations, molecular descriptors, molecular fingerprints, and polymer language model embeddings, were evaluated individually and in multimodal combinations. Models were assessed using random, MMseqs2 sequence-clustered, and leave-one-polymer-family-out splits to quantify both in-distribution performance and out-of-distribution generalization. Under random splits, several multimodal models achieved excellent predictive performance (AUROC > 0.95), with transformer-based protein embeddings consistently outperforming conventional representations. Performance declined substantially under sequence-clustered and polymer-family-based evaluations, underscoring the difficulty of generalizing to remote enzymes and previously unseen polymer classes. Incorporating polymer representations consistently improved predictive performance, particularly for sequence- and descriptor-based protein models, while multimodal combinations provided the greatest benefit under the most challenging evaluation settings. Ablation and SHAP analyses revealed an increasing reliance on learned protein and polymer embeddings as model complexity increased. A quantitative cost-benefit analysis further showed that conventional polymer descriptors provided the best balance between predictive performance, model reliability, and computational efficiency, whereas increasingly complex learned polymer representations yielded only modest additional gains. Overall, this study provides a practical framework for evaluating protein and polymer representations and offers guidance for developing more robust, generalizable, and computationally efficient machine learning models for enzyme–polymer interaction prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Engineering
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.6c00559
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Plastic Labels: Polymer-Aware Substrate Encoding Improves Plastizyme Prediction and Reliability Models

Joseph Wasswa, Bharath Ramsundar
ACS ES&T Engineering
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Beyond Plastic Labels: Polymer-Aware Substrate Encoding Improves Plastizyme Prediction and Reliability Models

Joseph Wasswa, Bharath Ramsundar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning is increasingly being used to identify plastic-degrading enzymes (plastizymes), yet systematic evaluations of how different protein and polymer representations influence predictive performance, generalization, and computational cost remain lacking. Here, we systematically evaluated protein–polymer representation strategies using a curated data set of 720 enzyme–polymer interactions spanning seven polymer families. Handcrafted and learned protein and polymer representations, including transformer-based embeddings, graph representations, molecular descriptors, molecular fingerprints, and polymer language model embeddings, were evaluated individually and in multimodal combinations. Models were assessed using random, MMseqs2 sequence-clustered, and leave-one-polymer-family-out splits to quantify both in-distribution performance and out-of-distribution generalization. Under random splits, several multimodal models achieved excellent predictive performance (AUROC > 0.95), with transformer-based protein embeddings consistently outperforming conventional representations. Performance declined substantially under sequence-clustered and polymer-family-based evaluations, underscoring the difficulty of generalizing to remote enzymes and previously unseen polymer classes. Incorporating polymer representations consistently improved predictive performance, particularly for sequence- and descriptor-based protein models, while multimodal combinations provided the greatest benefit under the most challenging evaluation settings. Ablation and SHAP analyses revealed an increasing reliance on learned protein and polymer embeddings as model complexity increased. A quantitative cost-benefit analysis further showed that conventional polymer descriptors provided the best balance between predictive performance, model reliability, and computational efficiency, whereas increasingly complex learned polymer representations yielded only modest additional gains. Overall, this study provides a practical framework for evaluating protein and polymer representations and offers guidance for developing more robust, generalizable, and computationally efficient machine learning models for enzyme–polymer interaction prediction.

ACS ES&T Engineering
Forest Research (GB), Forest Concepts (United States) (US), SUNY Polytechnic Institute (US)
State University of New York Polytechnic Institute
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.