Changing frequencies: Boston Naming Test normative data for Australian young adults

BACKGROUND: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a commonly used measure of visual confrontation naming, where performance is quantified relative to demographically representative normative data. Given that there are currently no BNT normative data for Australian young adults, the present study aimed to create normative data and determine item familiarity among this population. METHODS: Participants were 73 Australian university students (mean age 20.04 years, range 18-34 years old, 73% assigned female at birth). Participants were sampled on the standard BNT-2 items 1-60 and three additional Australian items. Normative data were created for this sample, producing z, T and percentile scores for raw BNT scores. Additionally, the number of correct responses to each item was calculated as the index of item familiarity. RESULTS: Mean BNT scores (mean 52.23/60, s.d. 4.44) were determined. At an item level, the current sample was uniquely unfamiliar with items 'yoke', 'trellis' and 'latch', and more familiar with items 'pretzel' and 'beaver' than normative samples from Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSIONS: Normative BNT data were produced for Australian young adults, the unique performance of which highlights the importance of representative and iteratively updated BNT normative data for accurate clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Impairment
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ib25146
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing frequencies: Boston Naming Test normative data for Australian young adults

Fiore D’Aprano, Annabel Hudson, Charles B. Malpas, Genevieve Rayner et al.
Brain Impairment
Psychological Testing and Assessment
article

Changing frequencies: Boston Naming Test normative data for Australian young adults

Fiore D’Aprano, Annabel Hudson, Charles B. Malpas, Genevieve Rayner, Chloe Sidwell
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a commonly used measure of visual confrontation naming, where performance is quantified relative to demographically representative normative data. Given that there are currently no BNT normative data for Australian young adults, the present study aimed to create normative data and determine item familiarity among this population. METHODS: Participants were 73 Australian university students (mean age 20.04 years, range 18-34 years old, 73% assigned female at birth). Participants were sampled on the standard BNT-2 items 1-60 and three additional Australian items. Normative data were created for this sample, producing z, T and percentile scores for raw BNT scores. Additionally, the number of correct responses to each item was calculated as the index of item familiarity. RESULTS: Mean BNT scores (mean 52.23/60, s.d. 4.44) were determined. At an item level, the current sample was uniquely unfamiliar with items 'yoke', 'trellis' and 'latch', and more familiar with items 'pretzel' and 'beaver' than normative samples from Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSIONS: Normative BNT data were produced for Australian young adults, the unique performance of which highlights the importance of representative and iteratively updated BNT normative data for accurate clinical decision-making.

Brain ImpairmentVol. 27(3)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Deakin University (AU), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Burwood Hospital (NZ), Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) (US), Research Center of Neurology (RU), Australian Psychological Society (AU), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.