An AI-based online learning platform improves blood cell morphology skills in medical laboratory technologists: a sequential explanatory study

Blood cell morphology training requires repetitive, feedback-rich practice, whereas conventional continuing professional development (CPD) relies largely on static materials. Rigorous evidence for theory-informed, AI-supported skill-based CPD remains limited. We evaluated whether the RuiZhiXue (RZX) platform, informed by Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) and operationalised through intelligent distractors and real-time AI-generated probability feedback, improves morphology skills among medical laboratory technologists compared with conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning. We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Fifty-two medical laboratory technologists were randomised to RZX ( n = 26) or conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning ( n = 26) for two weeks. Parallel pretest and posttest assessments, each consisting of 50 image-based MCQs drawn from a validated test bank strictly separated from practice items, were auto-scored. Semi-structured interviews with 16 technologists and three mentors were subsequently analysed thematically to help interpret the quantitative findings. Both groups improved from pretest to posttest, but the RZX group achieved a significantly higher mean posttest score than the conventional self-directed learning group (86.62 vs. 64.77, p < 0.001), with a very large observed between-group effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.16). The RZX group also showed lower posttest-score variance ( p = 0.01), indicating more consistent learning outcomes. Participants described real clinical case content, repeatable practice, intelligent distractors, and real-time AI-generated probability feedback as key learning supports. Compared with conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning, the RZX platform was associated with significantly higher posttest scores and lower posttest-score variance in blood cell morphology training among medical laboratory technologists. These preliminary findings suggest that a theory-informed, AI-supported learning environment may offer a promising model for further evaluation in laboratory medicine CPD. Future research should examine the effectiveness of this approach in multicentre settings, assess longer-term and workplace-based outcomes, and evaluate cost-effectiveness and implementation barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10188-9
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An AI-based online learning platform improves blood cell morphology skills in medical laboratory technologists: a sequential explanatory study

Runzhao Li, Peisong Chen, Zhenhua Gao, Ming Kuang et al.
BMC Medical Education
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

An AI-based online learning platform improves blood cell morphology skills in medical laboratory technologists: a sequential explanatory study

Runzhao Li, Peisong Chen, Zhenhua Gao, Ming Kuang, 杨大雅, Fan Zhang, Junxun Li, David Taylor, Yang Wang, Bin Huang, Juan Ouyang, Wange Lv
article en

Abstract

Blood cell morphology training requires repetitive, feedback-rich practice, whereas conventional continuing professional development (CPD) relies largely on static materials. Rigorous evidence for theory-informed, AI-supported skill-based CPD remains limited. We evaluated whether the RuiZhiXue (RZX) platform, informed by Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) and operationalised through intelligent distractors and real-time AI-generated probability feedback, improves morphology skills among medical laboratory technologists compared with conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning. We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Fifty-two medical laboratory technologists were randomised to RZX ( n = 26) or conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning ( n = 26) for two weeks. Parallel pretest and posttest assessments, each consisting of 50 image-based MCQs drawn from a validated test bank strictly separated from practice items, were auto-scored. Semi-structured interviews with 16 technologists and three mentors were subsequently analysed thematically to help interpret the quantitative findings. Both groups improved from pretest to posttest, but the RZX group achieved a significantly higher mean posttest score than the conventional self-directed learning group (86.62 vs. 64.77, p < 0.001), with a very large observed between-group effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.16). The RZX group also showed lower posttest-score variance ( p = 0.01), indicating more consistent learning outcomes. Participants described real clinical case content, repeatable practice, intelligent distractors, and real-time AI-generated probability feedback as key learning supports. Compared with conventional textbook- and atlas-based self-directed learning, the RZX platform was associated with significantly higher posttest scores and lower posttest-score variance in blood cell morphology training among medical laboratory technologists. These preliminary findings suggest that a theory-informed, AI-supported learning environment may offer a promising model for further evaluation in laboratory medicine CPD. Future research should examine the effectiveness of this approach in multicentre settings, assess longer-term and workplace-based outcomes, and evaluate cost-effectiveness and implementation barriers.

BMC Medical Education
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Gulf Medical University (AE), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.