When Does Geometry Beat a Token-Entropy Baseline for Predicting Semantic Entropy? A Robustness Audit of Training-Free Hallucination Signals

Training-free geometric features of transformer hidden states (trajectory curvature, eigenscore, effective rank) have been proposed as cheap, probe-free signals of semantic uncertainty for hallucination detection. We audit whether they deliver rather than proposing a detector, and find that a trivial token-entropy baseline matches or beats every one of them, and that which features appear reliable is set by the evaluation split rather than by the geometry. Across Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B on TruthfulQA, BioASQ and SQuAD v2 (six model-by-dataset cells), we score each feature as a direct predictor of meaning-clustered semantic entropy against the model's mean per-token entropy: one scalar from the same forward pass, computed independently of the answer sampling that defines the target, so the comparison is not circular. Token entropy wins on all five seeds in five of six cells, by a partial-correlation margin of +0.116 to +0.191; geometry fails to beat the baseline it was introduced to improve upon. Eigenscore and effective rank are largely sequence-length confounds: length explains about 98-99% and 58-93% of their variance, and their apparent signal vanishes under nonlinear length control. Curvature, the one length-independent feature, is small (partial r about 0.1-0.18) and redundant with the baseline. At the pre-registered held-out endpoint (n=245) the number of model-by-dataset cells in which curvature's confidence interval excludes zero swings from zero to three across five splits, while the full sample (n=817) is fixed at four. Because more than a third of items sit at the target's floor, with all ten generations collapsing into a single meaning cluster, every correlation reported is an attenuated lower bound; this bounds absolute magnitudes but not the ordering between features, which face an identical target. We argue that any training-free geometric uncertainty feature should be required to clear a token-entropy baseline on equal footing and survive a reseeded held-out evaluation, two cheap checks that the features examined here do not pass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21985260
Primary Topic
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

When Does Geometry Beat a Token-Entropy Baseline for Predicting Semantic Entropy? A Robustness Audit of Training-Free Hallucination Signals

Soumya Kumar Sinha
Open MIND
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
preprint

When Does Geometry Beat a Token-Entropy Baseline for Predicting Semantic Entropy? A Robustness Audit of Training-Free Hallucination Signals

Soumya Kumar Sinha
preprint en

Abstract

Training-free geometric features of transformer hidden states (trajectory curvature, eigenscore, effective rank) have been proposed as cheap, probe-free signals of semantic uncertainty for hallucination detection. We audit whether they deliver rather than proposing a detector, and find that a trivial token-entropy baseline matches or beats every one of them, and that which features appear reliable is set by the evaluation split rather than by the geometry. Across Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B on TruthfulQA, BioASQ and SQuAD v2 (six model-by-dataset cells), we score each feature as a direct predictor of meaning-clustered semantic entropy against the model's mean per-token entropy: one scalar from the same forward pass, computed independently of the answer sampling that defines the target, so the comparison is not circular. Token entropy wins on all five seeds in five of six cells, by a partial-correlation margin of +0.116 to +0.191; geometry fails to beat the baseline it was introduced to improve upon. Eigenscore and effective rank are largely sequence-length confounds: length explains about 98-99% and 58-93% of their variance, and their apparent signal vanishes under nonlinear length control. Curvature, the one length-independent feature, is small (partial r about 0.1-0.18) and redundant with the baseline. At the pre-registered held-out endpoint (n=245) the number of model-by-dataset cells in which curvature's confidence interval excludes zero swings from zero to three across five splits, while the full sample (n=817) is fixed at four. Because more than a third of items sit at the target's floor, with all ten generations collapsing into a single meaning cluster, every correlation reported is an attenuated lower bound; this bounds absolute magnitudes but not the ordering between features, which face an identical target. We argue that any training-free geometric uncertainty feature should be required to clear a token-entropy baseline on equal footing and survive a reseeded held-out evaluation, two cheap checks that the features examined here do not pass.

Open MIND
KIIT University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.