How labor market competition shapes workplace information on social media: evidence from Glassdoor reviews

We examine how labor market competition affects the quality of workplace information on social media. Using employer reviews on Glassdoor for U.S. publicly listed firms from 2011 to 2022, we find that reviews become less informative about actual workplace practices when firms face more intense competition for labor, consistent with competition inducing workplace information management. The decline in review informativeness is more pronounced when employees have narrower external networks, when firms are less unionized, and when firms have a smaller review base, suggesting that workplace information management is more likely when labor market information asymmetry is greater. Additional analyses show that positive reviews in highly competitive labor markets predict higher short-term labor inflows but greater subsequent employee turnover, indicating a gap between managed expectations and actual workplace conditions. Taken together, our evidence suggests that labor market competition potentially distorts the crowdsourced signals available to job seekers on anonymous review websites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09987-8
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How labor market competition shapes workplace information on social media: evidence from Glassdoor reviews

Liandong Zhang, Rencheng Wang, Shuo Li
Review of Accounting Studies
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

How labor market competition shapes workplace information on social media: evidence from Glassdoor reviews

Liandong Zhang, Rencheng Wang, Shuo Li
article en

Abstract

We examine how labor market competition affects the quality of workplace information on social media. Using employer reviews on Glassdoor for U.S. publicly listed firms from 2011 to 2022, we find that reviews become less informative about actual workplace practices when firms face more intense competition for labor, consistent with competition inducing workplace information management. The decline in review informativeness is more pronounced when employees have narrower external networks, when firms are less unionized, and when firms have a smaller review base, suggesting that workplace information management is more likely when labor market information asymmetry is greater. Additional analyses show that positive reviews in highly competitive labor markets predict higher short-term labor inflows but greater subsequent employee turnover, indicating a gap between managed expectations and actual workplace conditions. Taken together, our evidence suggests that labor market competition potentially distorts the crowdsourced signals available to job seekers on anonymous review websites.

Review of Accounting Studies
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Singapore Management University (SG)
Ministry of Education - Singapore, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.