Determinants of Failure to Rescue After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer: Insights From a National Inpatient Sample

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a postoperative complication, is an established quality metric; however, national data after pulmonary resection remain limited. We aim to identify patient‐, procedural‐, and hospital‐level factors associated with FTR after pulmonary resection for lung cancer and evaluate related outcomes. Methods The National Inpatient Sample (2016–2022) was used to identify adults undergoing elective pulmonary resection for lung cancer who developed ≥ 1 major complication. FTR was defined as in‐hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, costs, and discharge disposition. Results Among 14,575 patients with major complications, FTR occurred in 2.6%. Frailty (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.73–4.35) and comorbidity burden (Elixhauser ≥ 2: OR 4.87, 1.54–15.43) were the strongest predictors. Pneumonectomy (OR 2.78, 1.82–4.23), age ≥ 75 years (OR 2.21, 1.47–3.32), and open approach (OR 1.78, 1.41–2.24) were also associated, while female sex and private insurance were protective. No hospital factors were independently associated. Conclusions FTR is driven by patient vulnerability and procedural complexity rather than hospital characteristics. These findings emphasize preoperative risk stratification and complication management in high‐risk patients but do not support regionalization to high‐volume centers as a strategy to reduce FTR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70376
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of Failure to Rescue After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer: Insights From a National Inpatient Sample

Takashi Harano, Anthony W. Kim, Brooks V. Udelsman, Graeme Rosenberg et al.
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Determinants of Failure to Rescue After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer: Insights From a National Inpatient Sample

Takashi Harano, Anthony W. Kim, Brooks V. Udelsman, Graeme Rosenberg, Sean C. Wightman, Christina Kelly, Li Ding, Scott M. Atay
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a postoperative complication, is an established quality metric; however, national data after pulmonary resection remain limited. We aim to identify patient‐, procedural‐, and hospital‐level factors associated with FTR after pulmonary resection for lung cancer and evaluate related outcomes. Methods The National Inpatient Sample (2016–2022) was used to identify adults undergoing elective pulmonary resection for lung cancer who developed ≥ 1 major complication. FTR was defined as in‐hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, costs, and discharge disposition. Results Among 14,575 patients with major complications, FTR occurred in 2.6%. Frailty (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.73–4.35) and comorbidity burden (Elixhauser ≥ 2: OR 4.87, 1.54–15.43) were the strongest predictors. Pneumonectomy (OR 2.78, 1.82–4.23), age ≥ 75 years (OR 2.21, 1.47–3.32), and open approach (OR 1.78, 1.41–2.24) were also associated, while female sex and private insurance were protective. No hospital factors were independently associated. Conclusions FTR is driven by patient vulnerability and procedural complexity rather than hospital characteristics. These findings emphasize preoperative risk stratification and complication management in high‐risk patients but do not support regionalization to high‐volume centers as a strategy to reduce FTR.

Journal of Surgical Oncology
University of Southern California (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.