Turkish science curriculum reloaded: Epistemic practice demands in the newly released curricular documents

Abstract This study investigated the integration of epistemic practices in the 2024 Turkish science curriculums for grades 3–8, addressing the global shift towards a science‐as‐practice (epistemic turn) approach that positions students as epistemic agents engaged in practices like data analysis, argumentation and reasoning. Using a novel, epistemically oriented taxonomy, the study analysed 745 learning outcomes to assess the distribution and alignment of epistemic practice demands with students' cognitive and epistemic development. Findings revealed that while the curriculums incorporate 40 distinct epistemic practices (e.g. data gathering, model construction, inductive reasoning, classifying, control‐of‐variables, evidence‐based reasoning, identifying logical fallacies, experimenting, interrogating), their distribution was inconsistent and misaligned with students' developmental stages. Lower‐order practices (e.g. perception and conception) dominated, while higher‐order practices (e.g. causation, argumentation and abstraction) were underrepresented, potentially hindering students' progression towards advanced epistemic cognition. The study underscored the need for a balanced, developmentally sensitive curriculum design that progressively challenges students' epistemic capacities. The coding catalogue developed in this study may serve as a methodological tool for researchers and curriculum developers, enabling cross‐country comparisons and informing curricular revisions. Future research should explore the implementation of these practices in authentic classroom settings and examine the gap between curricular intentions and instructional realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Curriculum Journal
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.70083
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkish science curriculum reloaded: Epistemic practice demands in the newly released curricular documents

Yılmaz Soysal
The Curriculum Journal
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Turkish science curriculum reloaded: Epistemic practice demands in the newly released curricular documents

Yılmaz Soysal
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the integration of epistemic practices in the 2024 Turkish science curriculums for grades 3–8, addressing the global shift towards a science‐as‐practice (epistemic turn) approach that positions students as epistemic agents engaged in practices like data analysis, argumentation and reasoning. Using a novel, epistemically oriented taxonomy, the study analysed 745 learning outcomes to assess the distribution and alignment of epistemic practice demands with students' cognitive and epistemic development. Findings revealed that while the curriculums incorporate 40 distinct epistemic practices (e.g. data gathering, model construction, inductive reasoning, classifying, control‐of‐variables, evidence‐based reasoning, identifying logical fallacies, experimenting, interrogating), their distribution was inconsistent and misaligned with students' developmental stages. Lower‐order practices (e.g. perception and conception) dominated, while higher‐order practices (e.g. causation, argumentation and abstraction) were underrepresented, potentially hindering students' progression towards advanced epistemic cognition. The study underscored the need for a balanced, developmentally sensitive curriculum design that progressively challenges students' epistemic capacities. The coding catalogue developed in this study may serve as a methodological tool for researchers and curriculum developers, enabling cross‐country comparisons and informing curricular revisions. Future research should explore the implementation of these practices in authentic classroom settings and examine the gap between curricular intentions and instructional realities.

The Curriculum Journal
Hacettepe University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.