Electrochemical Control of a Superheavy Domain-Wall Lattice in an Adsorbed Halide Monolayer

Abstract Specific adsorption of halides at electrified metal/electrolyte interfaces provides a model platform for understanding how two-dimensional interfacial solids accommodate electrochemically induced misfit. A central unresolved question is whether potential-driven increases in adsorbate density are accommodated by homogeneous lattice compression or by insertion of a domain-wall, or solitons, lattice─a distinction that is particularly difficult to resolve under liquid-phase conditions. Here we use in situ electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy to show that the centered-rectangular striped phase of iodine on Au(111) is best described as a potential-tunable superheavy domain-wall lattice rather than a uniformly compressed overlayer. Increasing electrode potential drives continuous uniaxial electrocompression, shortening the stripe period from approximately (8a) to (4.5a) and increasing the coverage from 0.374 to 0.404 ML before the transition to the rotated-hexagonal phase. Reciprocal-space analysis links this evolution to soliton insertion, while atom-resolved imaging shows that the walls are not abrupt but remain strongly relaxed over several rows. Apparent noninteger wall indices arise from coexistence of neighboring integer stripe spacings within the STM field of view, rather than from fractional structural units. Local nearest-neighbor analysis further reveals that the iodine–iodine distance distribution broadens as the wall spacing decreases, showing that higher electrochemical compression produces a more heterogeneous wall-related strain field. These results establish the centered-rectangular phase of I/Au(111) as an atomically resolved example of potential-controlled soliton formation at a solid–liquid interface. More broadly, they show that electrochemical interfaces can accommodate potential-driven coverage changes through insertion of relaxed domain walls, providing a mechanistic picture for adsorbate ordering, strain relief, and phase evolution in two-dimensional interfacial solids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c04226
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical Control of a Superheavy Domain-Wall Lattice in an Adsorbed Halide Monolayer

Gianlorenzo Bussetti, Rafał Lewandków, Tomasz Kosmala, B. Brzostowski et al.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
article

Electrochemical Control of a Superheavy Domain-Wall Lattice in an Adsorbed Halide Monolayer

Gianlorenzo Bussetti, Rafał Lewandków, Tomasz Kosmala, B. Brzostowski, R. Wasielewski, Paulina Wira, Anna Futyma, Marek Nowicki, Klaus Wandelt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Specific adsorption of halides at electrified metal/electrolyte interfaces provides a model platform for understanding how two-dimensional interfacial solids accommodate electrochemically induced misfit. A central unresolved question is whether potential-driven increases in adsorbate density are accommodated by homogeneous lattice compression or by insertion of a domain-wall, or solitons, lattice─a distinction that is particularly difficult to resolve under liquid-phase conditions. Here we use in situ electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy to show that the centered-rectangular striped phase of iodine on Au(111) is best described as a potential-tunable superheavy domain-wall lattice rather than a uniformly compressed overlayer. Increasing electrode potential drives continuous uniaxial electrocompression, shortening the stripe period from approximately (8a) to (4.5a) and increasing the coverage from 0.374 to 0.404 ML before the transition to the rotated-hexagonal phase. Reciprocal-space analysis links this evolution to soliton insertion, while atom-resolved imaging shows that the walls are not abrupt but remain strongly relaxed over several rows. Apparent noninteger wall indices arise from coexistence of neighboring integer stripe spacings within the STM field of view, rather than from fractional structural units. Local nearest-neighbor analysis further reveals that the iodine–iodine distance distribution broadens as the wall spacing decreases, showing that higher electrochemical compression produces a more heterogeneous wall-related strain field. These results establish the centered-rectangular phase of I/Au(111) as an atomically resolved example of potential-controlled soliton formation at a solid–liquid interface. More broadly, they show that electrochemical interfaces can accommodate potential-driven coverage changes through insertion of relaxed domain walls, providing a mechanistic picture for adsorbate ordering, strain relief, and phase evolution in two-dimensional interfacial solids.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
University of Bonn (DE), Politecnico di Milano (IT), University of Borås (SE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.