A Multi-Scenario Urban Building Energy Modeling Workflow Validated Against Real Monitored Energy Data

Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) offers a scalable, physics-based method to simulate energy demand at the district level, enabling data-driven district energy demand planning and optimization. However, translating UBEM into a reliable, openly replicable workflow remains a significant methodological gap. In particular, limited attention has been devoted to the development of transparent and transferable UBEM workflows capable of systematically quantifying the impact of modeling assumptions on district-scale thermal demand accuracy. This paper presents and validates a five-step UBEM pipeline integrating freely available geospatial data from OpenStreetMap (OSM), archetype-based building characterization, multi-scenario EnergyPlus simulation via the Urban Modeling Interface (UMI) within a structured validation framework. To improve interpretability and reproducibility, a dedicated three-scenario simulation protocol was developed to isolate and quantify the influence of geometry simplifications, archetype assumptions, and weather data fidelity on model accuracy. The workflow is demonstrated through application to a real district heating system (DHS) in northern Italy, encompassing UBEM results validated against monitored consumption data at different temporal resolutions. The refined model achieves a district-scale annual magnitude error of 1.30% between real and simulated data. Persistent limitations in domestic hot water representation and peak load estimation are identified as priorities for future development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19163869
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Scenario Urban Building Energy Modeling Workflow Validated Against Real Monitored Energy Data

Alice Dénarié, Martina Ferrando, Sara Eslamieh
Energies
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

A Multi-Scenario Urban Building Energy Modeling Workflow Validated Against Real Monitored Energy Data

Alice Dénarié, Martina Ferrando, Sara Eslamieh
article en

Abstract

Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) offers a scalable, physics-based method to simulate energy demand at the district level, enabling data-driven district energy demand planning and optimization. However, translating UBEM into a reliable, openly replicable workflow remains a significant methodological gap. In particular, limited attention has been devoted to the development of transparent and transferable UBEM workflows capable of systematically quantifying the impact of modeling assumptions on district-scale thermal demand accuracy. This paper presents and validates a five-step UBEM pipeline integrating freely available geospatial data from OpenStreetMap (OSM), archetype-based building characterization, multi-scenario EnergyPlus simulation via the Urban Modeling Interface (UMI) within a structured validation framework. To improve interpretability and reproducibility, a dedicated three-scenario simulation protocol was developed to isolate and quantify the influence of geometry simplifications, archetype assumptions, and weather data fidelity on model accuracy. The workflow is demonstrated through application to a real district heating system (DHS) in northern Italy, encompassing UBEM results validated against monitored consumption data at different temporal resolutions. The refined model achieves a district-scale annual magnitude error of 1.30% between real and simulated data. Persistent limitations in domestic hot water representation and peak load estimation are identified as priorities for future development.

EnergiesVol. 19(16)
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.