Decoupled Mechanical and Surface Deterioration Trajectories of Cement Mortars with Different Fine Aggregates Under Freeze–Thaw Exposure

Fine-aggregate source can alter both the load-bearing response and surface scaling of mortar under freezing and thawing, but these responses are often reduced to a single durability ranking. This study compared coal gangue sand mortar (CGM), river sand mortar (RSM), desert sand mortar (DSM), and standard sand mortar (StSM) after 0, 25, and 50 freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs). Compressive strength and mass loss were measured using three replicate specimens per quantitative condition, while post-compression fragments were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The primary integrative analysis was a parameter-free two-dimensional damage-trajectory map that retained absolute compressive strength and mass loss as separate measured axes; a weighted coupled index was retained only as an auxiliary sensitivity check. Before cycling, the compressive strengths of StSM, RSM, DSM, and CGM were 68.13±0.48, 53.90±0.39, 19.47±0.33, and 6.49±0.07 MPa, respectively. After 50 FTCs, StSM retained the highest absolute strength (33.61±0.39 MPa) and the lowest mass loss (0.21±0.02%), whereas DSM retained 9.91±0.19 MPa and exhibited the highest mass loss (17.46±0.05%). The StSM trajectory moved primarily toward lower strength with negligible surface-material loss, while DSM moved toward both low residual strength and severe scaling. RSM showed substantial strength reduction followed by later-stage surface loss. CGM followed an atypical trajectory in which measured strength increased to 11.13±0.13 MPa while mass loss reached 9.67±0.04%; because age-matched non-frozen controls were unavailable, this apparent gain cannot be separated from continued hydration and specimen-age effects. The SEM images suggested pores, interfacial discontinuities, cracking, and matrix loosening, although some defects may have been induced or widened by compression. The trajectory representation exposed distinct deterioration modes without arbitrary weighting, whereas the calculated ordering of CGM and RSM in the auxiliary index changed with weighting and normalization choices. The results support reporting absolute residual strength and surface loss jointly when screening alternative fine aggregates for cold-region mortar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19163480
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoupled Mechanical and Surface Deterioration Trajectories of Cement Mortars with Different Fine Aggregates Under Freeze–Thaw Exposure

Feng Ji, Gang Wang, Yuexiang Xing, Ziwei Yan et al.
Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Decoupled Mechanical and Surface Deterioration Trajectories of Cement Mortars with Different Fine Aggregates Under Freeze–Thaw Exposure

Feng Ji, Gang Wang, Yuexiang Xing, Ziwei Yan, Hengxuan Qiao, Jiaerheng Adelieti
article en

Abstract

Fine-aggregate source can alter both the load-bearing response and surface scaling of mortar under freezing and thawing, but these responses are often reduced to a single durability ranking. This study compared coal gangue sand mortar (CGM), river sand mortar (RSM), desert sand mortar (DSM), and standard sand mortar (StSM) after 0, 25, and 50 freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs). Compressive strength and mass loss were measured using three replicate specimens per quantitative condition, while post-compression fragments were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The primary integrative analysis was a parameter-free two-dimensional damage-trajectory map that retained absolute compressive strength and mass loss as separate measured axes; a weighted coupled index was retained only as an auxiliary sensitivity check. Before cycling, the compressive strengths of StSM, RSM, DSM, and CGM were 68.13±0.48, 53.90±0.39, 19.47±0.33, and 6.49±0.07 MPa, respectively. After 50 FTCs, StSM retained the highest absolute strength (33.61±0.39 MPa) and the lowest mass loss (0.21±0.02%), whereas DSM retained 9.91±0.19 MPa and exhibited the highest mass loss (17.46±0.05%). The StSM trajectory moved primarily toward lower strength with negligible surface-material loss, while DSM moved toward both low residual strength and severe scaling. RSM showed substantial strength reduction followed by later-stage surface loss. CGM followed an atypical trajectory in which measured strength increased to 11.13±0.13 MPa while mass loss reached 9.67±0.04%; because age-matched non-frozen controls were unavailable, this apparent gain cannot be separated from continued hydration and specimen-age effects. The SEM images suggested pores, interfacial discontinuities, cracking, and matrix loosening, although some defects may have been induced or widened by compression. The trajectory representation exposed distinct deterioration modes without arbitrary weighting, whereas the calculated ordering of CGM and RSM in the auxiliary index changed with weighting and normalization choices. The results support reporting absolute residual strength and surface loss jointly when screening alternative fine aggregates for cold-region mortar.

MaterialsVol. 19(16)
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Institute of Metrology and Measurement (CN), Xinjiang Institute of Engineering (CN), People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (CN), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Uygur Medicine Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.