Beyond diagnosis in general practice: Predictive processing, a novel framework for persistent physical symptoms

BACKGROUND: Persistent physical symptoms are among the most common and challenging presentations in general practice, whether investigations are normal or reveal pathology insufficient to explain their severity. Patients and clinicians alike often experience these presentations as a dead end. Traditional biomedical models assume that symptoms passively reflect structural pathology, and that normal test results imply the absence of illness. OBJECTIVES: To introduce predictive processing as a theoretical framework for understanding persistent physical symptoms in general practice, and to outline its implications for clinical explanation and management. METHODS: This opinion paper draws on the predictive processing and active inference literature to develop a clinically applicable account of symptom perception, illustrated with clinical scenarios from general practice. RESULTS: Predictive processing proposes that symptoms are active perceptual constructions, generated by the brain as it infers the state of the body from incoming signals and prior beliefs. When prior beliefs of danger or irreversibility are strong, and peripheral signals are weak or ambiguous, these prior beliefs can dominate perception, producing substantial suffering in the absence of clear pathology. This framework explains symptom-test discordance and reframes normal results: they do not end clinical responsibility, but shift it towards modifying symptom-sustaining priors towards expectations of safety and recovery. CONCLUSION: For the general practitioner, this framework provides a coherent scientific rationale for explanation, continuity of care, expectation management, cognitive approaches and graded activity. These interventions emerge as core clinical tools, not consolation, when "nothing is found".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of General Practice
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2026.2717019
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond diagnosis in general practice: Predictive processing, a novel framework for persistent physical symptoms

Kees van Boven, Tim C. olde Hartman, Peter Lucassen, Omer Van den Bergh
European Journal of General Practice
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Beyond diagnosis in general practice: Predictive processing, a novel framework for persistent physical symptoms

Kees van Boven, Tim C. olde Hartman, Peter Lucassen, Omer Van den Bergh
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent physical symptoms are among the most common and challenging presentations in general practice, whether investigations are normal or reveal pathology insufficient to explain their severity. Patients and clinicians alike often experience these presentations as a dead end. Traditional biomedical models assume that symptoms passively reflect structural pathology, and that normal test results imply the absence of illness. OBJECTIVES: To introduce predictive processing as a theoretical framework for understanding persistent physical symptoms in general practice, and to outline its implications for clinical explanation and management. METHODS: This opinion paper draws on the predictive processing and active inference literature to develop a clinically applicable account of symptom perception, illustrated with clinical scenarios from general practice. RESULTS: Predictive processing proposes that symptoms are active perceptual constructions, generated by the brain as it infers the state of the body from incoming signals and prior beliefs. When prior beliefs of danger or irreversibility are strong, and peripheral signals are weak or ambiguous, these prior beliefs can dominate perception, producing substantial suffering in the absence of clear pathology. This framework explains symptom-test discordance and reframes normal results: they do not end clinical responsibility, but shift it towards modifying symptom-sustaining priors towards expectations of safety and recovery. CONCLUSION: For the general practitioner, this framework provides a coherent scientific rationale for explanation, continuity of care, expectation management, cognitive approaches and graded activity. These interventions emerge as core clinical tools, not consolation, when "nothing is found".

European Journal of General PracticeVol. 32(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Community Care (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.