Multimodal Non-Invasive Investigation of the Penitent Magdalene, Formerly in the Joseph Robinson Collection: New Technical Evidence for Attribution

This study presents a comprehensive non-invasive technical investigation of The Penitent Magdalene from the former Joseph Robinson Collection, a painting traditionally attributed to Anthony van Dyck rather than Peter Paul Rubens. High-resolution imaging, digital microscopy, ultraviolet fluorescence, infrared reflectography, X-radiography, macroscopic X-ray fluorescence mapping, and reflectance imaging spectroscopy were used to examine its materials, technique, and conservation history. The results reveal seventeenth-century materials and painting practices consistent with both Rubens and Van Dyck, together with extensive compositional revisions and painting techniques showing close affinities with Rubens and his workshop. Comparison with Titian’s Penitent Magdalene and Cornelis Cort’s engraving further demonstrates strong compositional relationships. The combined technical and art-historical evidence suggests that the long-standing preference for a Van Dyck attribution should be reconsidered and that Rubens deserves renewed consideration as a possible author.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9080324
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Non-Invasive Investigation of the Penitent Magdalene, Formerly in the Joseph Robinson Collection: New Technical Evidence for Attribution

Nobuyuki Kamba
Heritage
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
article

Multimodal Non-Invasive Investigation of the Penitent Magdalene, Formerly in the Joseph Robinson Collection: New Technical Evidence for Attribution

Nobuyuki Kamba
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive non-invasive technical investigation of The Penitent Magdalene from the former Joseph Robinson Collection, a painting traditionally attributed to Anthony van Dyck rather than Peter Paul Rubens. High-resolution imaging, digital microscopy, ultraviolet fluorescence, infrared reflectography, X-radiography, macroscopic X-ray fluorescence mapping, and reflectance imaging spectroscopy were used to examine its materials, technique, and conservation history. The results reveal seventeenth-century materials and painting practices consistent with both Rubens and Van Dyck, together with extensive compositional revisions and painting techniques showing close affinities with Rubens and his workshop. Comparison with Titian’s Penitent Magdalene and Cornelis Cort’s engraving further demonstrates strong compositional relationships. The combined technical and art-historical evidence suggests that the long-standing preference for a Van Dyck attribution should be reconsidered and that Rubens deserves renewed consideration as a possible author.

HeritageVol. 9(8)
Tokyo National Museum (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.