Evaluating Estimates of Recent Tuberculosis Transmission Using Epidemiologic and Whole-Genome Sequencing Data, Los Angeles County, California, 2014-2018

OBJECTIVES: Estimating the percentage of tuberculosis cases in a population attributable to recent transmission, compared with reactivation of past infections, is crucial for public health decision-making. This study evaluated a previously published plausible-source case (PSC) method for estimating recent transmission in Los Angeles County (LA County) against a reference standard based on epidemiologic and whole-genome sequencing data. METHODS: We analyzed tuberculosis cases diagnosed in LA County from 2014 through 2018 using surveillance data. Cases were classified as consistent or inconsistent with recent transmission using the PSC method and a stepwise review of epidemiologic links and single nucleotide polymorphisms (Epi/SNP). We compared classifications from both methods and assessed discrepancies. RESULTS: Of 2949 tuberculosis cases in LA County, 650 had epidemiologic and whole-genome sequencing data for evaluating recent transmission; 44 were excluded due to missing genotyping data, including 7 pediatric patients aged <15 years. The Epi/SNP review classified 195 (30%) cases as consistent with recent transmission, while the PSC method attributed 301 (46%) cases to recent transmission. The 2 methods agreed on 454 (70%) cases. Discrepancies arose from genetic diversity, geographic distance, nonmatching genotypes, and diagnosis timing. Performance varied by race and ethnicity, nativity, lineage, history of homelessness, and substance use. CONCLUSIONS: The PSC method accurately classified more than two-thirds of tuberculosis cases included in a cluster investigation in LA County. However, findings underscore the need to refine the PSC method by integrating whole-genome sequencing data, including nongenotyped cases in pediatric patients, and reevaluating the geographic and timing criteria to enhance completeness and inform public health interventions aimed at interrupting tuberculosis transmission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Reports
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549261468283
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Estimates of Recent Tuberculosis Transmission Using Epidemiologic and Whole-Genome Sequencing Data, Los Angeles County, California, 2014-2018

Kala M. Raz, Clinton J. McDaniel, Benjamin J. Silk, Jonathan M. Wortham et al.
Public Health Reports
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Evaluating Estimates of Recent Tuberculosis Transmission Using Epidemiologic and Whole-Genome Sequencing Data, Los Angeles County, California, 2014-2018

Kala M. Raz, Clinton J. McDaniel, Benjamin J. Silk, Jonathan M. Wortham, J Kammerer, Shameer Poonja, Sophia Hsu, Lauren Cowan, Tambi Shaw, Sarah Talarico, Alicia H. Chang, Wendy Noboa, Julie Higashi, James Posey, Martin Cilnis
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Estimating the percentage of tuberculosis cases in a population attributable to recent transmission, compared with reactivation of past infections, is crucial for public health decision-making. This study evaluated a previously published plausible-source case (PSC) method for estimating recent transmission in Los Angeles County (LA County) against a reference standard based on epidemiologic and whole-genome sequencing data. METHODS: We analyzed tuberculosis cases diagnosed in LA County from 2014 through 2018 using surveillance data. Cases were classified as consistent or inconsistent with recent transmission using the PSC method and a stepwise review of epidemiologic links and single nucleotide polymorphisms (Epi/SNP). We compared classifications from both methods and assessed discrepancies. RESULTS: Of 2949 tuberculosis cases in LA County, 650 had epidemiologic and whole-genome sequencing data for evaluating recent transmission; 44 were excluded due to missing genotyping data, including 7 pediatric patients aged <15 years. The Epi/SNP review classified 195 (30%) cases as consistent with recent transmission, while the PSC method attributed 301 (46%) cases to recent transmission. The 2 methods agreed on 454 (70%) cases. Discrepancies arose from genetic diversity, geographic distance, nonmatching genotypes, and diagnosis timing. Performance varied by race and ethnicity, nativity, lineage, history of homelessness, and substance use. CONCLUSIONS: The PSC method accurately classified more than two-thirds of tuberculosis cases included in a cluster investigation in LA County. However, findings underscore the need to refine the PSC method by integrating whole-genome sequencing data, including nongenotyped cases in pediatric patients, and reevaluating the geographic and timing criteria to enhance completeness and inform public health interventions aimed at interrupting tuberculosis transmission.

Public Health Reports
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US), California Department of Public Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.