Who is governing the global plastics crisis? Mapping the global plastics governance landscape

Abstract As plastic pollution intensifies, questions arise about whether the global plastics crisis (GPC) is being governed, and by whom. While an array of international institutions is often assumed to address this issue, the scholarship has yet to systematically examine who governs plastics and plastic pollution in practice. This article provides an empirical mapping of the GPC governance landscape, finding that multilevel public, civil society, and hybrid institutions incidentally facilitate governance through information dissemination, operational activities, and standard-setting. It identifies focal points that shape the global agenda and powerbrokers that disseminate it, with the United Nations Environment Programme and the Basel Convention emerging as influential. Meanwhile, private actor involvement is limited to multistakeholder partnerships that enable business and industry to feign environmental action while pursuing expansive business-as-usual practices. This article thereby establishes an empirical baseline for understanding GPC governance in the absence of a global plastics treaty, demonstrating that legal and regime-based classifications of institutional relevance offer an incomplete account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-026-09734-z
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is governing the global plastics crisis? Mapping the global plastics governance landscape

Babet de Groot
International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Who is governing the global plastics crisis? Mapping the global plastics governance landscape

Babet de Groot
article en

Abstract

Abstract As plastic pollution intensifies, questions arise about whether the global plastics crisis (GPC) is being governed, and by whom. While an array of international institutions is often assumed to address this issue, the scholarship has yet to systematically examine who governs plastics and plastic pollution in practice. This article provides an empirical mapping of the GPC governance landscape, finding that multilevel public, civil society, and hybrid institutions incidentally facilitate governance through information dissemination, operational activities, and standard-setting. It identifies focal points that shape the global agenda and powerbrokers that disseminate it, with the United Nations Environment Programme and the Basel Convention emerging as influential. Meanwhile, private actor involvement is limited to multistakeholder partnerships that enable business and industry to feign environmental action while pursuing expansive business-as-usual practices. This article thereby establishes an empirical baseline for understanding GPC governance in the absence of a global plastics treaty, demonstrating that legal and regime-based classifications of institutional relevance offer an incomplete account.

International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
University of Wollongong (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.