Health resource utilization and cost analysis in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic wounds: outcomes with porcine placental extracellular matrix versus standard of care and other advanced treatments

Aim: To compare the healthcare resource utilization, spending and clinical outcomes associated with porcine placental extracellular matrix (PPECM [InnovaMatrix ® AC, Convatec Triad Life Sciences, LLC, TN, USA]) versus standard of care (SOC) and other advanced treatments (AT) among Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) or venous leg ulcers (VLU). Materials & methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 100% Medicare Parts A and B administrative claims from October 2021 through December 2024. Treatment episodes for DFU and VLU were identified and categorized as PPECM plus SOC, SOC alone or AT plus SOC. Patients were followed for 6 months after the end of each treatment episode. Outcomes included post-episode healthcare utilization by site of care, per-patient-per-month spending, wound-related complications and amputations. Results: The final study sample included 109,786 eligible DFU patients (117,633 episodes of care; PPECM 0.2%, SOC 95.0%, AT 4.8%) and 53,624 eligible VLU patients (56,498 episodes of care; PPECM 0.1%, SOC 95.5%, AT 4.4%). In DFU, PPECM was associated with significantly lower post-episode utilization in most sites of care compared with SOC, and fewer wound complications including amputations compared with AT. Although total post-episode costs were higher for PPECM than SOC and AT in DFU, PPECM had lower overall cost at specific types of care sites. In VLU, PPECM was associated with significantly fewer visits across most sites of care compared with AT and SOC. PPECM-treated VLU episodes had significantly lower total costs than both SOC and AT. Rates of wound complications and amputations were similar across treatment groups in VLU. Conclusion: Treatment with PPECM demonstrated lower overall post-episode costs compared with SOC and other AT while maintaining safety outcomes, particularly in VLU, suggesting potential value in chronic wound management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0063
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health resource utilization and cost analysis in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic wounds: outcomes with porcine placental extracellular matrix versus standard of care and other advanced treatments

Rebecca Decker, Irene Varghese, J. Mackenzie, Caitlin Sheetz et al.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

Health resource utilization and cost analysis in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic wounds: outcomes with porcine placental extracellular matrix versus standard of care and other advanced treatments

Rebecca Decker, Irene Varghese, J. Mackenzie, Caitlin Sheetz, Peter Kardel, Serena Nally, Jenny Levinson, Cristin Taylor
article en

Abstract

Aim: To compare the healthcare resource utilization, spending and clinical outcomes associated with porcine placental extracellular matrix (PPECM [InnovaMatrix ® AC, Convatec Triad Life Sciences, LLC, TN, USA]) versus standard of care (SOC) and other advanced treatments (AT) among Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) or venous leg ulcers (VLU). Materials & methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 100% Medicare Parts A and B administrative claims from October 2021 through December 2024. Treatment episodes for DFU and VLU were identified and categorized as PPECM plus SOC, SOC alone or AT plus SOC. Patients were followed for 6 months after the end of each treatment episode. Outcomes included post-episode healthcare utilization by site of care, per-patient-per-month spending, wound-related complications and amputations. Results: The final study sample included 109,786 eligible DFU patients (117,633 episodes of care; PPECM 0.2%, SOC 95.0%, AT 4.8%) and 53,624 eligible VLU patients (56,498 episodes of care; PPECM 0.1%, SOC 95.5%, AT 4.4%). In DFU, PPECM was associated with significantly lower post-episode utilization in most sites of care compared with SOC, and fewer wound complications including amputations compared with AT. Although total post-episode costs were higher for PPECM than SOC and AT in DFU, PPECM had lower overall cost at specific types of care sites. In VLU, PPECM was associated with significantly fewer visits across most sites of care compared with AT and SOC. PPECM-treated VLU episodes had significantly lower total costs than both SOC and AT. Rates of wound complications and amputations were similar across treatment groups in VLU. Conclusion: Treatment with PPECM demonstrated lower overall post-episode costs compared with SOC and other AT while maintaining safety outcomes, particularly in VLU, suggesting potential value in chronic wound management.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
District of Columbia Department of Health (US), ConvaTec (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.