Financial Performance Evaluation of Türkiye’s Savings Finance Sector Using the CRITIC-EDAS Method

The rapid growth of Türkiye’s savings finance sector under Law No. 7292 has created demand for objective, multidimensional performance evaluation tools. This study assesses the financial performance of six savings finance companies in Türkiye over 2022–2024 using a hybrid CRITIC-EDAS multi-criteria decision-making model. Criterion weights for eight financial indicators—spanning profitability, operational efficiency, growth, and financial structure—were derived objectively via CRITIC, while EDAS produced the rankings, which were applied to criterion-direction-normalized data because the dataset contains negative values. The operating expense-to-revenue ratio carried the greatest weight in 2022 and 2023; gross profit margin became dominant in 2024. Katılımevim led the rankings in 2022 (ASi = 1.000); Eminevim then took the lead in 2023 (ASi = 1.000) and held it in 2024 (ASi = 0.968), with Fuzulev second (ASi = 0.815). A normalization artifact affecting two revenue-denominator ratios for one company (İmece) in 2024 was corrected through winsorization. Validity was confirmed in two stages: Spearman correlations between EDAS and the TOPSIS, MABAC, and MARCOS rankings exceeded the 0.89 reliability threshold in all three years, and a nine-scenario sensitivity analysis supported the rankings’ robustness. These findings give regulators, investors, and managers a replicable framework for evaluating performance in this young, underexamined sector and point to operational efficiency and outlier management as priorities for oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19080632
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial Performance Evaluation of Türkiye’s Savings Finance Sector Using the CRITIC-EDAS Method

Murat Ahmet DOĞAN
Journal of risk and financial management
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Financial Performance Evaluation of Türkiye’s Savings Finance Sector Using the CRITIC-EDAS Method

Murat Ahmet DOĞAN
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of Türkiye’s savings finance sector under Law No. 7292 has created demand for objective, multidimensional performance evaluation tools. This study assesses the financial performance of six savings finance companies in Türkiye over 2022–2024 using a hybrid CRITIC-EDAS multi-criteria decision-making model. Criterion weights for eight financial indicators—spanning profitability, operational efficiency, growth, and financial structure—were derived objectively via CRITIC, while EDAS produced the rankings, which were applied to criterion-direction-normalized data because the dataset contains negative values. The operating expense-to-revenue ratio carried the greatest weight in 2022 and 2023; gross profit margin became dominant in 2024. Katılımevim led the rankings in 2022 (ASi = 1.000); Eminevim then took the lead in 2023 (ASi = 1.000) and held it in 2024 (ASi = 0.968), with Fuzulev second (ASi = 0.815). A normalization artifact affecting two revenue-denominator ratios for one company (İmece) in 2024 was corrected through winsorization. Validity was confirmed in two stages: Spearman correlations between EDAS and the TOPSIS, MABAC, and MARCOS rankings exceeded the 0.89 reliability threshold in all three years, and a nine-scenario sensitivity analysis supported the rankings’ robustness. These findings give regulators, investors, and managers a replicable framework for evaluating performance in this young, underexamined sector and point to operational efficiency and outlier management as priorities for oversight.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(8)
Samsun University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.