Digital innovation and disability inclusion: a comparative analysis of Australian state government COVID-19 communication response

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed a persistent innovation–inclusion paradox: while states rapidly deployed digital solutions for pandemic management, they often failed to prioritise accessibility and disability inclusion from the outset. This article takes Australia as its case study to interrogate the country's response to the pandemic and the digital strategies adopted, focusing on the inclusion of people with disability. Through an analysis of the official state reviews and independent submissions of disability organisations, this article finds that successful strategies included listening to local voices, collaborating with trusted community leaders and influencers, expanding access to telehealth and remote work and adopting diverse communication channels to ensure public information was available in multiple languages and formats. As Australia faces ongoing public health challenges and climate-related emergencies, the lessons from COVID-19 underscore that true inclusion cannot be achieved through rapid digital innovation alone but requires a proactive, sustained commitment to accessibility and inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media International Australia
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x261478697
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital innovation and disability inclusion: a comparative analysis of Australian state government COVID-19 communication response

Katie Ellis, Divya Garg
Media International Australia
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Digital innovation and disability inclusion: a comparative analysis of Australian state government COVID-19 communication response

Katie Ellis, Divya Garg
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed a persistent innovation–inclusion paradox: while states rapidly deployed digital solutions for pandemic management, they often failed to prioritise accessibility and disability inclusion from the outset. This article takes Australia as its case study to interrogate the country's response to the pandemic and the digital strategies adopted, focusing on the inclusion of people with disability. Through an analysis of the official state reviews and independent submissions of disability organisations, this article finds that successful strategies included listening to local voices, collaborating with trusted community leaders and influencers, expanding access to telehealth and remote work and adopting diverse communication channels to ensure public information was available in multiple languages and formats. As Australia faces ongoing public health challenges and climate-related emergencies, the lessons from COVID-19 underscore that true inclusion cannot be achieved through rapid digital innovation alone but requires a proactive, sustained commitment to accessibility and inclusion.

Media International Australia
Curtin University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.