Where and Why Do Single-Family Neighborhoods in the United States Accommodate More Diverse Housing Types?

In the United States, the composition of housing stock rarely changes much in urbanized neighborhoods where single-family detached (SFD) housing predominates. Nevertheless, the housing stock does diversify in some such neighborhoods. Using multilevel regression models, we analyze the correlates of transitions toward greater housing diversity over ten years. Although most SFD-dominant neighborhoods remained unchanged, approximately 14 percent accommodated more diverse housing types. Proximity to jobs significantly increased the likelihood of diversification. Moreover, jurisdictions with at-large electoral systems were somewhat more conducive to large multifamily developments in formerly SFD-dominant areas, implying that centralized governance structures may reduce political barriers to zoning changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Planning Education and Research
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x261470720
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where and Why Do Single-Family Neighborhoods in the United States Accommodate More Diverse Housing Types?

Jae Hong Kim, Nicholas J. Marantz
Journal of Planning Education and Research
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Where and Why Do Single-Family Neighborhoods in the United States Accommodate More Diverse Housing Types?

Jae Hong Kim, Nicholas J. Marantz
article en

Abstract

In the United States, the composition of housing stock rarely changes much in urbanized neighborhoods where single-family detached (SFD) housing predominates. Nevertheless, the housing stock does diversify in some such neighborhoods. Using multilevel regression models, we analyze the correlates of transitions toward greater housing diversity over ten years. Although most SFD-dominant neighborhoods remained unchanged, approximately 14 percent accommodated more diverse housing types. Proximity to jobs significantly increased the likelihood of diversification. Moreover, jurisdictions with at-large electoral systems were somewhat more conducive to large multifamily developments in formerly SFD-dominant areas, implying that centralized governance structures may reduce political barriers to zoning changes.

Journal of Planning Education and Research
University of California, Irvine (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.