Ability of Large Language Models to Answer Patients’ Questions and Generate Educational Materials for Uncommon Retinal Conditions

Purpose: To assess the ability of large language models to accurately and comprehensively respond to frequently asked questions and generate patient education materials related to uncommon retinal conditions. Methods: A total of 50 frequently asked questions related to 10 uncommon retinal conditions were input into 3 large language models: ChatGPT-4o1, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Microsoft Copilot (updated January 7, 2025). The accuracy and completeness of responses to frequently asked questions were evaluated by retina specialists using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very inaccurate/not at all complete) to 5 (very accurate/completely complete), while readability was assessed using validated indices. The large language models were also instructed to generate patient education materials at specific reading levels, which were again evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and readability. Results: Responses to patient frequently asked questions were written at mean grade levels of 15.3 ± 1.4 (ChatGPT), 15.7 ± 1.9 (Gemini), and 14.6 ± 1.3 (Copilot), respectively ( P = .02). Mean accuracy scores were 4.02 ± 0.7, 4.16 ± 0.7, and 3.81 ± 0.8. Accuracy scores for large language models-generated patient education materials were 4.70 ± 0.7 (ChatGPT), 4.85 ± 0.4 (Gemini), and 4.30 ± 0.8 (Copilot). When instructed to revise educational materials to improve understandability, all large language models significantly reduced reading levels by 4.8 (ChatGPT), 6.9 (Gemini), and 3.8 (Copilot) grade levels ( P < .001) without compromising accuracy. Conclusions: Large language models can accurately respond to patients’ frequently asked questions related to uncommon retinal conditions. Furthermore, large language models can effectively improve the readability of existing education materials for patients with varying levels of health literacy. A deeper understanding of large language model applications may facilitate their integration into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261469005
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ability of Large Language Models to Answer Patients’ Questions and Generate Educational Materials for Uncommon Retinal Conditions

Prashant D. Tailor, Samuel Cohen, Alejandro I Marin, Hamid Hosseini et al.
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Ability of Large Language Models to Answer Patients’ Questions and Generate Educational Materials for Uncommon Retinal Conditions

Prashant D. Tailor, Samuel Cohen, Alejandro I Marin, Hamid Hosseini, Pradeep S. Prasad, Adrian Au, Julie Kwon, Jennifer Vu, Jayanth Sridhar
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the ability of large language models to accurately and comprehensively respond to frequently asked questions and generate patient education materials related to uncommon retinal conditions. Methods: A total of 50 frequently asked questions related to 10 uncommon retinal conditions were input into 3 large language models: ChatGPT-4o1, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Microsoft Copilot (updated January 7, 2025). The accuracy and completeness of responses to frequently asked questions were evaluated by retina specialists using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very inaccurate/not at all complete) to 5 (very accurate/completely complete), while readability was assessed using validated indices. The large language models were also instructed to generate patient education materials at specific reading levels, which were again evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and readability. Results: Responses to patient frequently asked questions were written at mean grade levels of 15.3 ± 1.4 (ChatGPT), 15.7 ± 1.9 (Gemini), and 14.6 ± 1.3 (Copilot), respectively ( P = .02). Mean accuracy scores were 4.02 ± 0.7, 4.16 ± 0.7, and 3.81 ± 0.8. Accuracy scores for large language models-generated patient education materials were 4.70 ± 0.7 (ChatGPT), 4.85 ± 0.4 (Gemini), and 4.30 ± 0.8 (Copilot). When instructed to revise educational materials to improve understandability, all large language models significantly reduced reading levels by 4.8 (ChatGPT), 6.9 (Gemini), and 3.8 (Copilot) grade levels ( P < .001) without compromising accuracy. Conclusions: Large language models can accurately respond to patients’ frequently asked questions related to uncommon retinal conditions. Furthermore, large language models can effectively improve the readability of existing education materials for patients with varying levels of health literacy. A deeper understanding of large language model applications may facilitate their integration into clinical practice.

Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Doheny Eye Institute (US), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.