A Population‐Based Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Uterine Cancer Care in Queensland, 2013–2022

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate how diagnostic procedures, treatments, access, and outcomes for uterine cancer have evolved over the last decade using real‐world data. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Unit record data were sourced from the population‐based Queensland Oncology Repository. Eighteen quality indicators were investigated. Patients with uterine cancer were stratified into two groups according to year of diagnosis (2013–2017 and 2018–2022). Poisson regression and multivariable flexible parametric survival modeling were used to evaluate changes over time, adjusted for key demographic and clinical characteristics. Results The study cohort consisted of 5423 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy among patients who had a definitive resection increased dramatically from 14% to 61% (relative likelihood [RL] = 4.24, 95% CI 3.76–4.79; p < 0.001). Use of laparoscopic procedures also increased significantly for both Stages I/II (RL = 1.12, 95% CI 1.08–1.15; p < 0.001) and Stages III/IV (RL = 1.48, 95% CI 1.30–1.68; p < 0.001). The percentage of uterine cancer patients who received a definitive resection within 30 days of diagnosis fell from 56% to 51% (RL = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97; p = 0.001), with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women faring worse (29%). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of dying within five years of definitive resection by period of diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.03; p = 0.11). Conclusion Our results have the dual purpose of highlighting opportunities for improvement while also providing benchmarks for the evaluation of uterine cancer care in Queensland into the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70167
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Population‐Based Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Uterine Cancer Care in Queensland, 2013–2022

Penelope M. Webb, Danny R. Youlden, Karen Sanday, Nathan Dunn et al.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

A Population‐Based Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Uterine Cancer Care in Queensland, 2013–2022

Penelope M. Webb, Danny R. Youlden, Karen Sanday, Nathan Dunn, Neal Rawson, Helen Hunt, Victoria Donoghue
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate how diagnostic procedures, treatments, access, and outcomes for uterine cancer have evolved over the last decade using real‐world data. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Unit record data were sourced from the population‐based Queensland Oncology Repository. Eighteen quality indicators were investigated. Patients with uterine cancer were stratified into two groups according to year of diagnosis (2013–2017 and 2018–2022). Poisson regression and multivariable flexible parametric survival modeling were used to evaluate changes over time, adjusted for key demographic and clinical characteristics. Results The study cohort consisted of 5423 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy among patients who had a definitive resection increased dramatically from 14% to 61% (relative likelihood [RL] = 4.24, 95% CI 3.76–4.79; p < 0.001). Use of laparoscopic procedures also increased significantly for both Stages I/II (RL = 1.12, 95% CI 1.08–1.15; p < 0.001) and Stages III/IV (RL = 1.48, 95% CI 1.30–1.68; p < 0.001). The percentage of uterine cancer patients who received a definitive resection within 30 days of diagnosis fell from 56% to 51% (RL = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97; p = 0.001), with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women faring worse (29%). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of dying within five years of definitive resection by period of diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.03; p = 0.11). Conclusion Our results have the dual purpose of highlighting opportunities for improvement while also providing benchmarks for the evaluation of uterine cancer care in Queensland into the future.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
The University of Queensland (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Metro South Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.