Guideline for the Evaluation of Biobank Collections

INTRODUCTION: Biobank collections are a fundamental pillar for translational biomedical research and significantly contribute to the improvement of healthcare. To ensure the long-term continuity of these collections, it is essential to strike a balance between the financial, societal, and operational aspects of the collections. METHODS: This paper provides advice for a guideline that outlines how to achieve this balance via periodic or interim evaluations of biobank collections by assessing their suitability for scientific research ("Specimen and Data Considerations") and their scientific potential ("Institutional Value and Resource Considerations"). RESULTS: The result of a periodic or interim evaluation is a combination of suitability ("Specimen and Data Considerations"-(meta)data, ethical-legal considerations, biological material) and the purpose of the biobank collection ("Institutional Value and Resource Considerations"-value, use, available resources). The presented guideline offers comprehensive directions and considerations to assist in making informed decisions regarding the retention, transfer, or termination of a biobank collection. DISCUSSION: Regular evaluations of biobank collections are necessary to ensure their value for scientific research. A well-balanced approach ensures the continuous availability of sufficient, high-quality research biomaterials and associated data and their careful handling. This balance is important for advancing scientific progress, ultimately resulting in a better understanding of disease and new opportunities for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19475535261479055
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guideline for the Evaluation of Biobank Collections

Peggy Manders, Wim Timens, Joëlle C. Schutten
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Guideline for the Evaluation of Biobank Collections

Peggy Manders, Wim Timens, Joëlle C. Schutten
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Biobank collections are a fundamental pillar for translational biomedical research and significantly contribute to the improvement of healthcare. To ensure the long-term continuity of these collections, it is essential to strike a balance between the financial, societal, and operational aspects of the collections. METHODS: This paper provides advice for a guideline that outlines how to achieve this balance via periodic or interim evaluations of biobank collections by assessing their suitability for scientific research ("Specimen and Data Considerations") and their scientific potential ("Institutional Value and Resource Considerations"). RESULTS: The result of a periodic or interim evaluation is a combination of suitability ("Specimen and Data Considerations"-(meta)data, ethical-legal considerations, biological material) and the purpose of the biobank collection ("Institutional Value and Resource Considerations"-value, use, available resources). The presented guideline offers comprehensive directions and considerations to assist in making informed decisions regarding the retention, transfer, or termination of a biobank collection. DISCUSSION: Regular evaluations of biobank collections are necessary to ensure their value for scientific research. A well-balanced approach ensures the continuous availability of sufficient, high-quality research biomaterials and associated data and their careful handling. This balance is important for advancing scientific progress, ultimately resulting in a better understanding of disease and new opportunities for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Biopreservation and Biobanking
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure Consortium (AT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.