Reconsidering G. Haynes’ (2023) Speculation about the Hebior Mammoth Site: A Correction

A photograph in the Milwaukee Public Museum shows an excavated lithic artifact at the Hebior site lying on light-colored sediment, below a near-white mammoth bone. The sediment under the lithic appears to be the same pale color as the fluidized sand that had been injected into darker sediment elsewhere in the Hebior site. In a PaleoAmerica article (Haynes, G. 2022. “Sites in the Americas with Possible or Probable Evidence for the Butchering of Proboscideans.” PaleoAmerica 8 (3): 187–214), and based on the Museum photograph, Haynes speculated that the artifact might have been injected into the Hebior bonebed along with the fluidized sand during a geological event, potentially related to seismic activity. However, the photograph in the Museum is either badly exposed, badly printed, bleached from the display lighting, or had been manipulated to make the bone and the artifact easier to discern. A record photograph of the materials in situ shows the sediment around, above, and beneath the lithic artifact is uniformly darker in color, and the bone above the artifact is not white. The speculation that the artifact was injected with sand is not supported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PaleoAmerica
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2026.2715318
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering G. Haynes’ (2023) Speculation about the Hebior Mammoth Site: A Correction

Daniel J. Joyce, Gary Haynes
PaleoAmerica
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Reconsidering G. Haynes’ (2023) Speculation about the Hebior Mammoth Site: A Correction

Daniel J. Joyce, Gary Haynes
article en

Abstract

A photograph in the Milwaukee Public Museum shows an excavated lithic artifact at the Hebior site lying on light-colored sediment, below a near-white mammoth bone. The sediment under the lithic appears to be the same pale color as the fluidized sand that had been injected into darker sediment elsewhere in the Hebior site. In a PaleoAmerica article (Haynes, G. 2022. “Sites in the Americas with Possible or Probable Evidence for the Butchering of Proboscideans.” PaleoAmerica 8 (3): 187–214), and based on the Museum photograph, Haynes speculated that the artifact might have been injected into the Hebior bonebed along with the fluidized sand during a geological event, potentially related to seismic activity. However, the photograph in the Museum is either badly exposed, badly printed, bleached from the display lighting, or had been manipulated to make the bone and the artifact easier to discern. A record photograph of the materials in situ shows the sediment around, above, and beneath the lithic artifact is uniformly darker in color, and the bone above the artifact is not white. The speculation that the artifact was injected with sand is not supported.

PaleoAmerica
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.