Reference man’s hidden hand: gender, power and the social construction of skill in VET

This paper examines how Australia’s Vocational Education and Training (VET) policy frameworks perpetuate gender inequity through the social construction of skill. Drawing on transformative gender theory and Bacchi and Eveline’s ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ approach, it analyses policy instruments, including Training Package policies and the Qualifications Reform Design Group project. The analysis reveals how apparently gender-neutral policies embed masculinised assumptions about learners, work and skill, promoting occupational segregation and disadvantaging women. Central to this is VET’s ‘reference man’, an implicit, unencumbered male archetype shaping policy design and implementation. The paper identifies critical silences in current reforms around workplace culture, care responsibilities and intersectional disadvantage. It argues for a shift away from deficit-based interventions that aim to ‘fix women’, calling instead for transformative approaches confronting structural inequities. It concludes by positioning VET as a site for social justice, urging policymakers to move beyond narrow economic objectives toward equitable outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Training Research
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2026.2712978
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference man’s hidden hand: gender, power and the social construction of skill in VET

Kit McMahon
International Journal of Training Research
Education Systems and Policy
article

Reference man’s hidden hand: gender, power and the social construction of skill in VET

Kit McMahon
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how Australia’s Vocational Education and Training (VET) policy frameworks perpetuate gender inequity through the social construction of skill. Drawing on transformative gender theory and Bacchi and Eveline’s ‘What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ approach, it analyses policy instruments, including Training Package policies and the Qualifications Reform Design Group project. The analysis reveals how apparently gender-neutral policies embed masculinised assumptions about learners, work and skill, promoting occupational segregation and disadvantaging women. Central to this is VET’s ‘reference man’, an implicit, unencumbered male archetype shaping policy design and implementation. The paper identifies critical silences in current reforms around workplace culture, care responsibilities and intersectional disadvantage. It argues for a shift away from deficit-based interventions that aim to ‘fix women’, calling instead for transformative approaches confronting structural inequities. It concludes by positioning VET as a site for social justice, urging policymakers to move beyond narrow economic objectives toward equitable outcomes.

International Journal of Training Research
Griffith University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.